Pages

Wednesday, 10 May 2017

How corrupted is our PM , is he or is he not

Watch the video and form your own opinion and can start a discussion here


How Corrupt Is Malaysia’s Prime Minister


Najib Razak
Prime Minister of Malaysia
Dato' Sri Haji Mohammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak is the sixth and current Prime Minister of Malaysia. He was sworn into the position on 3 April 2009 to succeed Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. 
Born: July 23, 1953 (age 63 years), Kuala Lipis, Malaysia
Full name: Mohammad Najib bin Abdul Razak
Education: University of Nottingham
Spouse: Rosmah Mansor (m. 1987), Tengku Puteri Zainah Tengku Eskandar (m. 1976–1987)
Children: Mohd Nazifuddin Najib, Nooryana Najwa Najib, Nizar Najib, Norashman Najib, Puteri Norlisa Najib
Siblings: Mohamed Nazir bin Abdul Razak, Johari Razak, Nazim Razak, Nizam Razak

F.B.I. Director James Comey Is Fired by Trump


By MICHAEL D. SHEAR and MATT APUZZOMAY 9, 2017


President Trump often publicly pushed back against the now-fired director of the F.B.I., James Comey, including over Hillary Clinton’s emails and Russia links.

Here’s a closer look. By SUSAN JOAN ARCHER, ROBIN LINDSAY and DAVE HORN on Publish Date May 10, 2017. Photo by Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times. Watch in Times Video »

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Tuesday fired the director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, abruptly terminating the top official leading a criminal investigation into whether Mr. Trump’s advisers colluded with the Russian government to steer the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

The stunning development in Mr. Trump’s presidency raised the specter of political interference by a sitting president into an existing investigation by the nation’s leading law enforcement agency. It immediately ignited Democratic calls for a special counsel to lead the Russia inquiry.

Mr. Trump explained the firing by citing Mr. Comey’s handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, even though the president was widely seen to have benefited politically from that inquiry and had once praised Mr. Comey for his “guts” in his pursuit of Mrs. Clinton during the campaign.

But in his letter to Mr. Comey, released to reporters by the White House, the president betrayed his focus on the continuing inquiry into Russia and his aides.

“While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the bureau,” Mr. Trump said in a letter to Mr. Comey dated Tuesday. White House officials refused to say anything more about the three occasions Mr. Trump cited.

Trump Jim Comey saved Hillary Clinton's life

The officials said that Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, pushed for Mr. Comey’s dismissal. But many in Washington, including veteran F.B.I. officers, saw a carefully choreographed effort by the president to create a pretense for a takedown of the president’s F.B.I. tormentor.


Why Comey was fired by Trump

Document: White House Announces Firing of James Comey
“I cannot defend the director’s handling of the conclusion of the investigation of Secretary Clinton’s emails,” Mr. Rosenstein wrote in another letter that was released by the White House, “and I do not understand his refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken.”

Reaction in Washington was swift and fierce. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said the firing could make Americans suspect a cover-up. Mr. Trump lashed back later Tuesday night in a Twitter post: “Cryin’ Chuck Schumer stated recently, ‘I do not have confidence in him (James Comey) any longer.’ Then acts so indignant.”

Many Republicans assailed the president for making a rash decision that could have deep implications for their party. Representative Justin Amash, Republican of Michigan, said on Twitter that he now supports an independent commission to investigate the Russia links to Mr. Trump. He called Mr. Trump’s claim that Mr. Comey had cleared him three times “bizarre.”
Comey Hearing Adds to Chaos of Trump Presidency A Closer Look


“I’ve spent the last several hours trying to find an acceptable rationale for the timing of Comey’s firing,” Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said on Twitter. “I just can’t do it.”

In a sign of the F.B.I.’s intense interest in Mr. Trump’s advisers, a grand jury in Virginia issued subpoenas in recent weeks for records related to the former White House national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, according to an American official familiar with the case. Mr. Flynn is under investigation for his financial ties to Russia and Turkey. Grand jury subpoenas are a routine part of federal investigations and are not a sign that charges are imminent. It was not clear that the subpoenas, which were first reported by CNN, were related to Mr. Comey’s firing.

The dismissal ended the long-deteriorating relationship of Mr. Trump and Mr. Comey, who repeatedly collided publicly and privately. For Mr. Trump, a president who puts a premium on loyalty, Mr. Comey represented an independent and unpredictable director with enormous power to disrupt his administration.

Mr. Comey learned from news reports that he had been fired while addressing bureau employees in Los Angeles. While Mr. Comey spoke, television screens in the background began flashing the news. In response to the reports, Mr. Comey laughed, saying that he thought it was a fairly funny prank. Shortly after, Mr. Trump’s letter was delivered to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington.


Kellyanne Conway, a senior White House adviser, spoke to reporters outside the White House on Tuesday. Ms. Conway said the firing was not related to Russia. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times
Mr. Comey was three years into a 10-year term, an unusually long tenure that Congress established to insulate the director from political pressure. Though the president has the authority to fire the F.B.I. director for any reason, Mr. Comey is only the second director to be fired in bureau history. President Bill Clinton fired William S. Sessions in 1993.

Mr. Trump had already fired his acting attorney general for insubordination and his national security adviser for lying to Vice President Mike Pence about contacts with Russians. But firing Mr. Comey raises much deeper questions about the independence of the F.B.I. and the future of its investigations under Mr. Trump.

In an instance of bizarre timing and optics, the White House announced late Tuesday night that Mr. Trump would meet on Wednesday in the Oval Office with Sergey V. Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister.

F.B.I. agents were enraged by the firing and worried openly that Mr. Trump would appoint a White House ally to lead them. Mr. Comey was widely liked in the F.B.I., even by those who criticized his handling of the Clinton investigation. Agents regarded him as a good manager and an independent director.

“It is essential that we find new leadership for the F.B.I. that restores public trust and confidence in its vital law enforcement mission,” Mr. Trump wrote, a remark that particularly upset agents who saw it as an insult to them.

The White House has not said what precipitated the firing, a significant question because the Justice Department’s stated reasons were well known even when Mr. Trump decided in January to keep Mr. Comey on the job. Mr. Trump watched last week as Mr. Comey testified on Capitol Hill, offering his first public explanation of his handling of the Clinton email case. There, Mr. Comey said that he had no regrets about his decisions but that he felt “mildly nauseous” that his actions might have tipped the election to Mr. Trump.

The Clinton controversy centers on a news conference Mr. Comey held last July, when he broke with longstanding tradition and policies by publicly discussing the Clinton case and chastising Mrs. Clinton’s “careless” handling of classified information. Then, in the campaign’s final days, Mr. Comey announced that the F.B.I. was reopening the investigation, a move that earned him widespread criticism. At the time, though, Mr. Trump and his attorney general, Mr. Sessions, praised Mr. Comey for actions that are now at the heart of the F.B.I. director’s firing.

Comey Tried to Shield the F.B.I. From Politics. Then He Shaped an Election.

As the F.B.I. investigated Hillary Clinton and the Trump campaign, James B. Comey tried to keep the bureau out of politics but plunged it into the center of a bitter election.
Mr. Trump “saw an opening” to fire Mr. Comey after the testimony, a White House official said. Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, argued against it, delaying — but not overruling — the decision. Mr. Trump received the documents from the Justice Department on Tuesday. Aides also compiled a stack of news clips criticizing Mr. Comey.

Mr. Comey’s firing came hours after the F.B.I. corrected his testimony last week about how classified information ended up on the laptop of the disgraced former congressman Anthony D. Weiner.

Mr. Comey had told the Senate Judiciary Committee that during the F.B.I.’s investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, officers uncovered evidence that her aide, Huma Abedin, had “forwarded hundreds and thousands of emails, some of which contain classified information” to Mr. Weiner, her husband.

But the F.B.I. told Congress that only a few of the emails had been forwarded and that the vast majority were simply backed up to Mr. Weiner’s laptop.

Mr. Comey’s deputy, Andrew G. McCabe, a career F.B.I. officer, became acting director, the Justice Department said. The White House said the search for a director will begin immediately.

The firing puts Democrats in a difficult position. Many had hoped that Mrs. Clinton would fire Mr. Comey soon after taking office, and blamed him as costing her the election. But under Mr. Trump, Mr. Comey was seen as an important check on the new administration.

Kellyanne Conway, a senior White House adviser, said the firing was not related to Russia. “Today’s actions had zero to do with that,” she said in a contentious interview on CNN. Democrats were unconvinced.

“Any attempt to stop or undermine this F.B.I. investigation would raise grave constitutional issues,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois.

Mr. Trump’s decision to fire Mr. Comey marks the president’s latest law enforcement purge. In early February, Mr. Trump fired Sally Q. Yates, who had worked in the Obama administration but was serving as acting attorney general. In March, he fired Preet Bharara, the United States attorney in Manhattan, after assuring the prosecutor months earlier that he could stay on. But the president’s firing of Mr. Comey was far more consequential, as Ms. Yates and Mr. Bharara both were holdovers, and might only have served in the Trump administration for a matter of days or weeks.

A longtime prosecutor who served as the deputy attorney general during the George W. Bush administration, Mr. Comey came into office in 2013 with widespread bipartisan support. The defining moment in Mr. Comey’s career — until Tuesday night — came in 2004 during a hospital room standoff with White House officials who wanted to pressure the Justice Department to reauthorize a secret wiretapping program. Mr. Comey stood his ground.

Mr. Trump has been furious with news stories about his campaign’s ties to Russia. The White House has been critical of the leaks at the heart of those stories and tried unsuccessfully to enlist Mr. Comey in an effort to rebut the stories.

In a Twitter message last week, Mr. Trump accused Mr. Comey of being “the best thing that ever happened to Hillary Clinton,” and said he gave her “a free pass for many bad deeds.” After the president accused former President Barack Obama of wiretapping his office, Mr. Comey publicly declared those claims untrue.

Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a post on Twitter that Mr. Comey “should be immediately called to testify in an open hearing about the status of Russia/Trump investigation at the time he was fired.”

Before announcing the firing, Mr. Trump called leaders on Capitol Hill to tell them of his decision. Mr. Schumer told Mr. Trump that he was making a “big mistake.” Mr. Trump paused.

“O.K.,” he said. “We’ll see.”


EXPOSED – MAHATHIR’S ‘CLANDESTINE COLLABORATION’ IN SABAH

NAJIB CAMP ACCUSES EX PM OF FUNDING G25 PROMINENT MALAYS TO INCITE RELIGIOUS UNHAPPINESS AHEAD OF STATE POLLS

Sabah
Malaysian state
Sabah is a Malaysian state occupying the northern part of the island of Borneo. It's famed for its 4,095m-tall Mount Kinabalu, the country’s highest peak, crowned with distinctive granite spires. Sabah is also known for its beaches, rainforest, coral reefs and abundant wildlife, much of it within parks and reserves. Offshore, the Sipadan and Mabul islands are noted diving destinations.
Area: 28,429 mi²
Malaysia Agreement: 16 September 1963a
Population: 3.544 million (2015)
Divisions: List: Interior; Kudat; Sandakan; Tawau; West Coast

In the past few general elections, it will be preceded by religious instigation.

At one time, it was the kalimah Allah and Catholic publication, The Herald issues. Earlier, it was the conversion of Azlina @ Lina Joy Christianity.

Malaysia's Lina Joy loses Islam conversion case

Lina Joy, a Malay-Muslim who tried to be legally recognised as a Christian. 
Lina Joy
BornAzlina Jailani
28 July 1964 (age 52)
Malaysia
NationalityMalaysian
Known forCourt Challenge re Religious Conversion



There is also the interfaith issue with regard to the faith of children of usually Hindu couple, in which one of the spouse converted to Islam.

The amendment to Act 164 to resolve the issue of children faith was to be tabled in the last Parliament seating but postphoned.

Hindraf gathered influence among the Indians by inciting on religious sensitivity on Hindu-Islam disputes and demolition of illegal Hindu temples.

A recent viral video of a Hindraf gathering is rising temperature that a group of Malay Muslim NGOs have gathered to do a demonstration.

Perkasa can only be expected to be present in such hot issues. It raise the profile.

Hindraf will be in their elements as general election draws near.

This time around the amendment to Act 355 on syariah law as tabled by PAS President, Haji Hadi Awang is a hotly contested issue.

Tun Dr Mahathir said it is PAS’s political manouvre. He may be right because DAP that agreed before to allow PAS with their Islamic agenda has now did a U turn.

Some how or rather, Mahathir is likely to be more involved in instigating religious sensitivity now.


It is not because Perkasa is involved in the protest against the weakening influence Hindraf,

But the recent statement by G25 Sabah  raise such suspicion. The statement can be found in Malaysia Today here.

Sabah and Sarawak BN (including Sabah UMNO MPs) have stated they will not support RUU 355 in Parliament. The opposition will naturally oppose.

However the question should be asked as to why the need for G25 to do such a campaign in Sabah.

More so, the gist of their argument is that the Malaysian constitution is secular. It is rather repetitive argument and debate is endless that it has been more rhetorical than factual.

The fact is the Malaysia is neither a fully secular nor fully theological state. It is bit of both for the simple reason the Malaysian constitutional history traces back to the Malacca sultanate era which practises hudud.

Despite what our forefather had said, no secular constitution would have provisions for religion and compulsory state allocation for the Federal religion.

G25 has no basis to convert Sabah to oppose Act 355. That is unless there is a political intention.

And, it means lending a hand to Mahathir and Pakatan Harapan and/or to attack the BN seats in Sabah.

People are more likely to be willing to die for their religion than for their race or country. It is the best formula to incite hatred and emotion to hate the government.


However, one may argue that G25 made it clear that they are apolitical. When Mahathir had a meeting with them, they rejected his request for support.

In fact, it ended with exchanges between Tawfik Tun Dr Ismail and Mahathir. Tawfik openly told Mahathir he has baggage and not the right person to criticise or topple Dato Najib.

In response, Mahathir said Tawfik and G25 cannot be trusted.

It could be all show and drama because several months later, G25 Sabah was formed.

It is heard G25 people from Kuala Lumpur came and toured the state for a month till the current Sabsh G25 members are put together.


Who finance G25 expenses to campaign throughout Sabah for a month?
They stayed at Hyatt Kota Kinabalu and being distinguish individuals they are, they do not rough it up in their travel.

Who could have paid for their stay and travelling?

Well, words on the grapevine is that a well known Mahathir financier paid for it.

It is not a surprise for Mahathir to do a clandestine collaboration. His views on Islam resembles Islam liberal, in which the main dispute is the authority of ulamak.

This view manifest itself in him hosting anti-hadith Kassim Ahmad forum at Yayasan Kepimpinan Perdana in Putrajaya.

Mahathir’s daughter, Dato Marina is a part of G25 and a vociferous women’s lib and Islam liberal activist. Mahathir supported Marina in her fight for the cross dressing case in Seremban.

G25 Sabah serve Mahathir’s political purpose to break BN’s stronghold in Sabah. Mahathir or his stooge, Parti Warisan Sabah’s Dato Shafie Apdal has too many sin in Sabah to be credibly accepted.

The only option is to instigate religious sentiment by using NGOs like G25 to be their voice.

These sort of issues appeal to the professional, intellectuals, and upper strata of Sabah society. Their influence serve to swing votes against BN.

The open quarrel after Mahathir’s meeting with G25 was meant to be a cover.

And the cover is blown when Tawfik’s own nephew joined PPBM’s protem commitee despite himself being a vocal critic of Mahathir.

It is not a surprise that it is another wayang Tamil of Mahathir.

Too obvious, isn’t it?

– http://anotherbrickinwall.blogspot.my/

Colombian executed on drugs charges

Ismael Enrique Arciniegas Valencia was executed in China on drugs charges.
72 year old drug mule Ismael Enrique Arciniegas Valencia given lethal injection in China in spite of government efforts.

On February 27, 72 year old Ismael Enrique Arciniegas Valencia became the first Colombian to be executed on drug trafficking charges in China. Arciniegas was caught with 4kg of cocaine – worth around USD$5,000 – at Guangzhou airport, a port city northwest of Hong Kong in 2010. 

China’s stance on drugs is rigid: being caught with over 50 grams of cocaine makes you eligible for the death penalty, while anything less carries life imprisonment. In 2013, The Cali-born former journalist was sentenced to the death penalty.
China's Executing One of Its Richest Men  China Uncensored

In an interview with Semana, Juan José Herrera, Arciniegas’s son, thanked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Colombian Consulates in Guangzhou and Beijing for their work over the last seven years. He spoke to his father the night before he was given the lethal injection. On September 18, 2013 Herrera’s uncle Luis Germán Arciniegas died of illness in prison in Macau, Hong Kong, also serving a drug trafficking sentence.

Expert: China is fit for lethal injections


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement expressing their condolences to the family and said Arciniegas’s ashes would be returned to his son in Cali. The Ministry, which fought against the execution up to the last minute, said, “The Colombian state recognises the right of countries to establish and enforce their legislation in criminal matters, but we categorically reiterate our position against the death penalty and reaffirm the inviolable right to life.”
China Mekong killers before execution

Colombia
Country in South America
Colombia is a country at the northern tip of South America. It's landscape is marked by rainforests, Andes mountains and numerous coffee plantations. In the high-altitude capital, Bogotá, the Zona Rosa district is known for its restaurants and shops. Cartagena, on the Caribbean coast, has a walled colonial Old Town, a 16th-century castle and nearby coral reefs.
Capital and largest cityBogotá; 4°35′N 74°4′W / 4.583°N 74.067°W
CurrencyColombian peso
Population48.23 million (2015) World Bank

China TV Drug Lords Kills Live Execution Plans at Last Minute

There are currently five Colombians condemned to death in China, and a further ten awaiting a two year review. Government figures put the number of Colombians in prisons around the world at 15,034, with 56.7% of those charged with drug offenses.



China's Death Sentence

The families of those imprisoned in China have been trying to draw attention to the poor condition and the deteriorating health of those convicted. Luz Miriam Medina Pérez, whose husband and son are both five years into their life sentences in Guangzhou where she now lives, told Semana that “their hands and feet are rotten from the conditions.”

Despite the risk, Colombia’s criminal groups are increasingly drawn to the Asian country. An InSight Crime analysis last year pointed out, “With a population of over 1.3 billion, a rising middle class, growing drug consumption and a narcotics industry worth an estimated US$82 billion, China is surely an attractive market for Colombian groups.”

Letter: Grenada's police officers need ethics and discipline


Dear Sir:

In Grenada, the innocents are convicted far more frequently than those who operate the system dare to believe. One primary purpose of Grenada’s civil rights laws is to protect citizens from abuses by government, including police misconduct. Although police officers generally have some powers to carry out their duties, Grenada’s constitution and laws, however, place limits on how far they can go in trying to enforce the law.

letters_icon.jpg Police officers are required to carry out their duties with a punctilious regard for the constitutional rights of every Grenadian citizens, who are entitled to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” without unjustified interference by the police.

Unfortunately today, corruption in Grenada, within the police force has taken over, and police officers are overstepping their authority and violating people’s rights, often doing so intentionally and maliciously.

The most common form of civil rights cases involves false arrest, as in the case I will address here. This is quite common in Grenada, because the citizens don’t know their rights. False arrest occurs when a police officer detains or confines a person against his own will and without proper legal authority.

Grenada
Country in the Caribbean
Grenada is a Caribbean country comprising a main island, also called Grenada, and smaller surrounding islands. Dubbed the “Spice Isle,” the hilly main island is home to numerous nutmeg plantations. It’s also the site of the capital, St. George’s, whose colourful homes, Georgian buildings and early-18th-century Fort George overlook narrow Carenage Harbour. To the south is Grand Anse Beach, with resorts and bars.
CurrencyEastern Caribbean dollar
Recognised regional languagesGrenadian Creole English; Grenadian Creole French
Population106,825 (2015) World Bank

Stranded passengers in St George’s were prohibited by a female police officer Kathy Ann Smith from boarding a bus that was going to take them to their destination, after they faced a long wait to board a delayed bus. They were forced to scramble for substitute transportation after their bus didn’t show up. Tired and hungry and wanting to get to their homes, they boarded another bus that came to their rescue. That bus it seems was prohibited from soliciting passengers along the bus route.

The stranded passengers were immediately commanded to get off the bus by the female officer, who verbally abused and insulted the passengers. Frustration soon turned to anger with passengers and the officer locked in a verbal altercation. One witness said, “The passengers only wanted to get home to their family. The officer did not use discretion; maybe she did not learn that in the police academy.”

The safety of the citizens should have been her primary concern. Instead she chose to arrest one of the passengers whose only crime was to explain to her the situation that was unfolding with the buses.

Royal Grenadian Police station, Grand Anse, St. George's, Grenada

Law enforcement in Grenada is the responsibility of the Royal Grenada Police Force, or RGPF. The RGPF enforces criminal, immigration, and maritime laws. It is also held responsible for seaport security and fire services. With 15 police stations and 900 staff members, the force responds to over 15,000 crimes and incidents per year. The Royal Grenada Police Force also has a paramilitary force for national defense.


The female police officer, Kathy Ann Smith last week demonstrated willful and unreasonable conduct becoming of an officer in the arrest of a citizen, who responded to her nasty and malicious verbal abuse against him and other witnesses.

In that case, the officer violated the individual’s constitutional rights. She lacked probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings. This was clearly a false arrest. She got in his face, pointed her fingers back and forth, was disrespectful towards the passengers. He did nothing wrong, no swearing, no threats. A female passenger who was present made a video of what transpired that evening, but she was threatened with arrest, if she ever posted it online. My advice to her: “Get that video to the commissioner immediately.” A young innocent man now has a criminal record that he doesn’t deserve.

After verbally abusing the passengers, she left the scene only to return with two male officers and arrested only the young man, and laid some seven bogus trumped up charges against him. He was held for two nights and refused bail. He was also charged with resisting arrest. Even though he left without a fuss with the officers, according to eyewitnesses.

In reality, the young man is an innocent victim, who was arrested in retaliation for speaking up. He was punished by the female officer for answering back. This was clearly an unlawful arrest and detention of an innocent young man, expressing his rights guaranteed to him and the other passengers by the Grenada constitution. This behaviour by a police officer stems from a type of “occupational arrogance” because she thinks her authority should not be challenged or questioned.

Mr Prime Minister, the look-the-other-way approach in Grenada to police misconduct creates a culture of corruption that can have dangerous and deadly consequences. The people of Grenada, Carriacou and Petit Martinique cannot continue to condone this despicable behaviour. Accountability should be a vital element in Grenada’s policing.

Grenada’s police officers should be protecting, helping the communities and neutralizing situations, not escalating them. Not all police officers are bad, but when they make a mistake they should own up to it, and be disciplined. “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” Bad officers need to know that Grenadian people are serious and we will fight for change.

Some of the police officers need ethics and discipline because, without it, police officers are nothing more than government thugs with badges and guns. There are those who say that is exactly how it is with some police officers in Grenada today. But if that is the truth, and all cops were rogue and ran around being lawless, Grenada, our country would be very different

Others say the real reason is that Grenada’s criminal justice is so rotten and corrupt it merits nothing so much as being torn down to its foundations, and rebuilt.

Someone has to be held accountable for this young 22-year-old having a criminal record attached to him. That record can alter the entire course of his life, as job and college applications routinely ask if one has ever been convicted of a crime.

This happens quite a lot in Grenada. This has got to stop. People take guilty plea deals knowing they didn’t commit a crime. This is not okay. Instead of fighting the seven charges leveled against the young man, who asserted his innocence, his lawyer advised him to plead guilty… shameful. This lawyer should be punished in a meaningful way for his transgressions.

This case is deeply disturbing on almost too many levels to count. This young man was arrested for speaking up, and left traumatized by an unremittingly brutal and corrupt police environment towering before him, and the power of the courts, commonly viewed as a cold faceless bureaucracy.

We are determined to expose the machinations of the leviathan that chews through the lives of innocent Grenadians.

The young man spent two days in lock up and has missed work days, which might cause him to lose his job. On top of that he was charged EC$1,500 by the lawyer. “Accept the deal and go home with a criminal record.” This is the pain and sadness that he is dealing with. Too many people are facing similar charges, lack the same determination to prove their innocence. As a united Grenadian people, we must fight back against this disgusting form of police abuse and corruption. Grenadians in the diaspora are calling on the DA to drop all charges, because the verdict and charges should never have been brought.

If an attorney doesn’t adequately advise or explain everything to a client, or fails to negotiate a plea bargain on his client behalf, then the client might have a viable claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. But arguing that you had ineffective assistance of counsel after you have pleaded guilty is a difficult task. You have to prove that your lawyer did a terrible job and the terrible job made a difference in the outcome of your case.

Or the DA will just throw out the bogus charges

This young man must contact a qualified civil rights attorney immediately, to protect his rights, because he is a victim of police misconduct. Grenadians please know your rights, read, read.

Do not allow yourselves to be intimidated by any police officer. Police may illegally seize or delete evidence recorded by citizens, notwithstanding laws that make it a crime to destroy evidence of a crime being committed, irrespective of whether the crime was committed by civilians or by police officers.

Helen Grenade

The ghost towns left behind by Cuba's shuttered sugar mills

After the closing of the mills “about 272 employees had to reinvent themselves. Some changed jobs. Others traveled daily to mills that continued grinding.” Photo by Julio Batista for Periodismo de Barrio, used with permission

The people's council of Gregorio Arleé Mañalich, in the western province of Mayabeque, is better known as el Central, which means sugar mill in Cuban Spanish. However, sugar harvest isn’t talked about there anymore. Twelve years ago, production at the mill was halted, and then came the dismantling. Piece by piece, the mill was taken apart until there was nothing more than steel infrastructure and concrete. 

About 272 employees had to reinvent themselves. Some changed jobs. Others traveled daily to mills that continued grinding.


Cuba
Country in the Caribbean
Cuba is a Caribbean island nation under communist rule. It has sugar-white beaches and is dotted with tobacco fields, which play a part in the production of the country's legendary cigars. The capital, Havana, is lined with pastel houses, 1950s-era cars and Spanish-colonial architecture in the 16th-century core, Old Havana. Salsa music plays in the dance clubs and cabaret shows are performed at the famed Tropicana.
Capital: Havana
President: Raúl Castro
Population: 11.39 million (2015) World Bank
Currencies: Cuban convertible peso, Cuban peso
Official language: Spanish


The sugar harvest doesn't worry Nene, an old welder who still gets up everyday at 4 in the morning. He doesn't lose any sleep over the sugar harvest. But then he heard that there were mills in the east that had begun grinding again after a lot of inactivity. They had apparently been maintained.

That did keep him awake that night.

In Mañalich, Nene remembers perfectly, they said they’d maintain the mill, but they didn't.


The sugar industry in Cuba has encountered many merciless hurdles: the collapse of the socialist block, low market values, inefficiencies, bad administrative decisions and climate change.

In 2016, production was at 1.6 million tons of sugar, less than what was being produced back in 1910. That kind of news would have shocked the nation decades ago, but the failure of the sugar cane harvest is no longer a concern in Cuba.

Why was the sugar cane industry dismantled?



The old way station on the sugar mill property has seen its best days. Photo: Julio Batista

The downsizing of the sugarcane industry was an economic necessity: the total of 155 mills -- which were technologically behind and uncompetitive -- was unsustainable for the country. The initial approach was to consolidate the production efficiently, with a cap of four million tons a year.

Only the factories capable of producing sugar at a cost of four cents a pound or less would remain. And the solution to the unemployment that came as a result: going back to school.

The motives to take such measures were the low productivity of sugarcane fields and the slump on sugar in the global market.

However, the price of sugar began to improve over a decade ago.

From 2017 through 2025, the price of unrefined sugar is expected to level off between 15 and 16 cents per pound, according to the 2016 edition of the “Agricultural Perspectives” from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Had production in 2001 been maintained (3.6 million tons), about $815 million would have been made from the export of unrefined sugar.

Things weren't going so well

“Today will surely become a historic day,” were the first words of Cuban President Fidel Castro during his speech on October 21, 2002 at Lavandero mill. So began the restructuring of the sugar industry.

In the following years, a total of 98 mills would be closed down and more than 65,000 people would receive their full salary for going back to school. The Gregorio Arleé Mañalich mill's turn would arrive on May 14, 2004.

Luis Alberto Pérez (or Nene, as everyone calls him) had worked there since 1967. When he speaks of the closing of the sugar mill, the word he repeats the most is “deception.”

Almost all the interviewees agree: They were never told that the mill would be dismantled.

A team stayed on to work full-time on preserving the place. But before the first year was up, letters began to arrive. They were formulaic documents in which the only things that changed were the names of the pieces to be extracted, the recipient and the date. All were signed by the Cuban minister of sugar at the time, Ulises Rosales del Toro. Only the minister could authorize each extraction. Further responsibilities would be delegated afterwards, however, and the letters would arrive more frequently.

For two years, Juan Carlos Rivero was head of the Closed Factory (the official name given to mills and agro-industrial complexes that had to be closed down) and amongst those who received the letters. “The country had neither money to buy supplies, nor spare parts for the factories that were functioning,” he assures.

Eddy Reyes, 64, is waiting to reach the retirement age at another mill, the Bouris Luis Santa Coloma. Against his will, he had to dismember the installations he had put in place before. With each piece he stripped, he was dismantling 31 years of his own life.

The direct legacy of closing a hundred sugar mills has been a string of communities with engineers and technicians that, suddenly, didn't have any factories to help operate or repair.

The best distributed industrial branch of Cuba and the oldest employment source in the nation were eliminated; and in many ways, no alternatives were created for those lost jobs or for the services in the communities where the mills were located.

We will never know if during his lengthy inauguration speech on October 21, 2002, the Cuban president looked in the faces of those who were listening to him when he guaranteed that everything was going well in the factories that had stopped grinding five years prior.

The impact of closing the sugar mills on people


After 2004, in Mañalich, the only place that processes sugar cane are “guaraperas”: small places where the sugar cane is squeezed to make juice. Photo by Julio Batista, used with permission 

Two years later, the people's council of Gregorio Arleé Mañalich would realize that, when a mill closes, a lot of things change, but almost never for the better.

When the mill closed, or rather, when it was destroyed, they also stopped paving highways and thus, services declined.

Without work in the town and too old to study, Nene and Eddy had to go work for other mills. They became replacement parts. Without a hopeful future in their isolated town, many other young people finally left too.


Cuba closes once powerful sugar ministry


In the small neighborhood surrounding the sugar mill, a pasta factory was built, but it couldn't even produce enough noodles to feed the municipality. The scraps of the sugar mill that remained at the base of the new establishment remained untouched, imposing.

At the end of 2016, Nene returned from the Boris Luis Santa Coloma mill to the ruins of the place where he had started working. Forty-nine sugar harvests allowed him to settle in Mañalich with more than 2,000 pesos.

Nene -- black, short, with few teeth and a clear voice -- is not a spiteful man, but he will never forgive them for lying to him. The distress has consumed him over the last decade. He retired at 65. But it wasn't because he lacked strength; rather, because he was bitter.

This article written by Periodismo de Barrio and translated by Johnnie Douglas originally appeared on Global Voices on May 9, 2017

SHOWDOWN IN BEIJING OVER BANDAR MALAYSIA FIASCO

ORIGINAL CONSORTIUM TO COMPLAIN ABOUT NAJIB TO XI OVER BANDAR MALAYSIA FIASCO DESPITE THREAT OF REVENGE FROM M’SIAN GOVT

THE joint venture that lost the Bandar Malaysia deal has sought Beijing’s help to salvage their purchase, prompting Putrajaya to review incentives given to the Malaysian partner, Iskandar Waterfront Holdings Sdn Bhd (IWH).


Minister and 1MDB president are said to be no longer in charge of key projects linked to state fund

Report: Dalian Wanda may lead development of Bandar Malaysia

The Malaysian Insight understands that IWH boss Lim Kang Hoo has flown to the Chinese capital to personally appeal for Beijing’s assistance to restore the IWH-CREC Sdn Bhd’s (ICSB) RM7.42 billion purchase of 60% of Bandar Malaysia.



The Malaysian government got wind of the latest move and has threatened to rescind incentives given to IWH’s Danga Bay project in Iskandar Malaysia – the sprawling economic corridor north of Singapore.

“The government is not amused and will protect its sovereign decision,” a source told The Malaysian Insight.
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, who is also finance minister, is due to arrive in Beijing tomorrow to attend the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation from May 14 to 15.

He is due to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping before the summit and announce the new master developer for the Bandar Malaysia project. The Singapore Straits Times reported yesterday that Chinese real estate giant Dalian Wanda is in the lead to be the master developer.

Putrajaya had announced it was looking for a new master developer after it terminated the deal with ICSB on May 3.

MoF unit TRX City Sdn Bhd, which owns Bandar Malaysia, said the December 31, 2015 share sale agreement with ICSB had lapsed after the joint venture failed to pay up despite 12 extensions. ICSB was to have paid the entire amount by June 2016.

ICSB immediately disputed TRX City’s decision to terminate the deal, saying it has fulfilled its part and reserved all rights to take further action. ICSB is 40% owned by IWH with the rest owned by China Railway Engineering Corporation (CREC), a state-owned enterprise.

Malaysia launched the Iskandar Malaysia economic area in November 2006 and is run by the Iskandar Region Development Authority (IRDA). Putrajaya has givens several tax incentives to push start business in the region.

The incentives include exemption from corporate income tax for 10 years from income in the region for businesses that start on or before December 31, 2020.



Also, exemption from compliance with withholding tax provisions on payment of royalty and services fee to non-residents for a period of 10 years from commencement of operations.

IWH’s Danga Bay, an international waterfront development starting from Lido Boulevard up to Skudai Kiri and the New Coastal Highway, was granted the incentives starting September 1, 2013 until December 31, 2020.

Putrajaya had also announced that starting May 2014, companies newly investing more than RM10 million, excluding land costs, in the services sector may qualify for corporate tax exemption for five years, as well as import and sales duty incentives for certain machinery and equipment.

There will also be flexibility from full compliance with the central bank’s foreign exchange rules and recruitment of foreign knowledge workers.

– www.themalaysianinsight.com

Traitors in the midst of Pakatan Harapan and mostly in DAP

Traitors in Pakatan Harapan , yes many are and do not realize they will be the ones because they are already been compromised during to the...

Popular Post