Pages

Monday, 10 April 2017

Pilot who dropped sarin bomb which killed 87 Syrians is a General who carried out ANOTHER gas attack last month

Pilot who dropped sarin bomb which killed 87 Syrians is a General who carried out ANOTHER gas attack last month







  • ·        
    General Mohammed Hasouri named as pilot responsible for sarin gas attack
    ·         He was pictured being congratulated for the raid at Shayrat airbase on Saturday 
    ·         General is thought to be behind another gas attack which sickened 70 in March


    ·         It is thought that General Hasouri dropped the sarin gas bomb which killed 87. Assad's regime claims it bombed al-Qaeda weapons dumps which released the nerve agent
    ·          
    Shehabi captioned the image: 'Syrian army chief of staff thanks General Haytham Hasouri for destroying Qaeda's weapons facilities in Khan Sheikhoun, Edlib.'

    It is thought Shehabi used a false first name to try and protect the General's identity, though the image matches previous pictures of him. A source also confirmed to The Times that the man in the picture was Mohammed Hasouri.
    ·          



Ottawa's 'Local Company' And The Taib Family Back In The Spotlight In Canada

Ottawa's 'Local Company' And The Taib Family Back In The Spotlight In Canada



Readers can rest assured that the enormous pearls clustered by the dozen around Jamilah’s neck are entirely genuine.
The Taib family women are notorious for their obsession with gaudy baubles, as are other females linked to the Malaysian grand kleptocracy, including the wife of the present prime minister.
This weekend the Ottawa Citizen newspaper took up the investigation into the Taib family’s massive real estate  development company in Canada, publishing a major analysis of the Bruno Manser Fund (BMF) report on Sakto and its affiliates around the globe.
Sakto, which is headed by Jamilah’s husband Hisham (Sean) Murray, rounded back on its findings, stating to the Ottawa Citizen:
“The assertions made by this foreign activist group are false, malicious and sensationalized. This organization’s rehashed and repackaged allegations have been found to be lacking in merit and never substantiated by any government or authoritative body.”
In which case one has to ask why Mr Murray has always balked at taking legal action, despite having threatened it against both Sarawak Report and BMF a number of times?


Jamilah and auntie Raziah Geneid – draped in gems as always


Sakto has invested Sarawak’s money in sweeping glass towers and appartments in Ottawa – leaving people living like this back home
All BMF’s allegations are based on public records, so what, one wonders, can be called “false”?  BMF points to the likelihood that if the majority of Sakto’s records were not secret, thanks to Canada’s notorious lack of transparency for an advanced nation, then there would be even more evidence of Taib funding of his young daughter’s business.
So. if Mr Murray dislikes the suggestion and says it is untrue, why does he not simply open up his company’s records to the level that you would expect for example in the UK or Australia and reveal who the shareholders are of Sakto and publish the company’s annual reports?
Murray and his family have sought to present the company as being owned by them, however the evidence points to the presumption that it is 100% owned by the Taibs, so why not just publish the facts?

Instead, he is content to call people who have no financial or any other interest in making false accusations about Sakto “malicious liars”.

Sakto has invested Sarawak’s money in sweeping glass towers and appartments in Ottawa – leaving people living like this back home

Sean has donated heavily to political parties in Canada with his Sarawak money (note the fur and diamonds)
He also claims that the allegations are “re-packaged” and have already “been found to be lacking in merit”. Really? Where and by whom were the allegations found to be lacking in merit? Certainly not in a court of law, where it seems Sean is too chicken to test the matter.
In their recent statements Sakto have claimed that they are a “local company” and denied their funding came from Taib’s corrupt kickbacks from Sarawak, contrary to mounds of information provided by BMF (and indeed Sarawak Report).
However, the Ottawa Citizen points out that these statements by Sakto contradict their own earlier boasts way back when they started out in the 80’s and 90’s when they told the Ottawa Citizen that Sakto was a “firm that specializes in offshore investment in Canada.”

Sean has donated heavily to political parties in Canada with his Sarawak money (note the fur and diamonds)

Sakto towerblock in Ottawa
Jamilah also boasted publicly at that time that Sakto had a number of big investors from the Pacific Rim region,.
However, later Sakto acknowledged that there were only three shareholders besides herself, all of them Taib family members, including her uncle Onn, who was one of the original registered directors.
Who are the others and where did all Sakto’s ‘shareholder loans’ come from?
So, if Jamilah is so willing to flaunt her wealth and to claim everything is above board, why not flaunt those accounts and stop being so coy?
See the full article from the Ottawa Citizen below:


Anything familiar? In their statements the Taib/Murrays boast about their famed “local philanthropy”.  It makes them part of a long line of Malaysian kleptocrats who have hidden behind philanthropy in rich countries, whilst ignoring the poor back home from whence they stole their money.  Maybe the Taibs should stop trying to buy favours and plaudits in Canada with money taken from the lands of the poor natives of Sarawak and maybe Canadians should stop accepting it?

Sakto towerblock in Ottawa

Ottawa real estate company’s ties to Malaysia questioned

MATTHEW PEARSON, OTTAWA CITIZEN
More from Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: April 9, 2017 | Last Updated: April 9, 2017 7:15 PM EDT
A Swiss NGO says financing for an Ottawa company’s high-profile real-estate projects comes, at least in part, from corruption in the Borneo rainforest — an allegation the company fiercely denies.
In an 86-page report released at a press conference on Parliament Hill last week, the Bruno Manser Fund says Sakto Corp., owner of Little Italy’s Preston Square development, grew quickly after it was founded in 1983 by Jamilah Taib Murray, despite continuous operational losses and a resulting capital deficiency that had grown to nearly $10 million by 1993.
The secret to the company’s success, the report alleges, “was a continuous capital influx” from its shareholders, the Taib family, which included Taib Murray and her uncle, Onn Mahmud.
Taib Murray, who came to Ottawa as a teenager to attend school, is the daughter of Abdul Taib Mahmud, a long-serving and powerful politician in Sarawak, Malaysia’s largest state.
Taib Mahmud, now 80, has long been dogged by controversy because, rainforest advocates say, Sarawak under his watch lost more than 90 per cent of its primeval tropical rainforest, one of the most biodiverse habitats in the world, to logging and palm oil plantations.
Meanwhile, in Canada, his daughter started her real estate business with an undisclosed amount of money she received from her father — money he says he received as a gratuity when he resigned from Malaysia’s federal government in 1981, according to the report.
“With the help of family and friends, we founded Sakto Corporation when I was in my early 20s. Teamwork, smart business choices and savvy negotiation skills enabled us to grow Sakto Corportation into the successful company it is today,” Taib Murray writes on her personal website.
Sakto Corp.’s current assets are estimated at $200 million, not counting its subsidiaries and related businesses in the U.K., the United States, Australia and Malaysia. It recently won Ottawa city council’s endorsement to add a 25-storey building to Preston Square.
The company responded to a list of questions the Citizen sent by email with a statement.
“Sakto Corporation is a reputable, local Canadian company whose officers, directors and shareholders are Canadian,” the statement said. “The company is led by a local family known for being community supporters and philanthropists.”
“The assertions made by this foreign activist group are false, malicious and sensationalized. This organization’s rehashed and repackaged allegations have been found to be lacking in merit and never substantiated by any government or authoritative body.”
Attempts to reach Abdul Taib Mahmud, who currently serves in the ceremonial role of governor of Sarawak, and Onn Mahmud, through his Singapore-based lawyer, were unsuccessful.
A January 1989 Citizen story characterized Sakto as a “firm that specializes in offshore investment in Canada.”
Up to that point, Sakto had only invested in residential properties, building up a portfolio of 450 apartments, condominiums and garden homes since the company was founded in 1983.
But the 1989 Citizen article said Sakto’s most ambitious project to date was the $45-million Commerce Plaza (known today at Preston Square), which took four years to put together.
“Taib Murray calls the three-tower retail-office complex a test of her abilities in the eyes of absentee shareholders,” the Citizen article said.
The Taibs have bought and built private residences in Ontario with a current tax worth that’s in excess of $15.2 million, including a mansion in Rockcliffe Park, says the report, citing Municipal Property Assessment Corp. valuations from 2012.
By 1993, the report says members of the Taib family had invested at least $29.8 million in the Sakto Corp. ($28.8 million in loans, $1.01 million in share capital). The report contends the source of these funds is unknown.
Three years later, the report alleges, the Taib family secured two mortgages of $20 million each on Sakto properties in Ottawa. One of the mortgages was registered for “Jamilah Taib” and the other for “Jamilah Taib, in trust.” It’s unclear why this was done, the report says.
There’s a further twist to the 1996 mortgage registered for “Jamilah Taib, in trust”: One of the lenders was an offshore company in Hong Kong controlled by Onn Mahmud, Taib Murray’s uncle. Its only known business activity, the report says, was to provide loans to the Sakto Corp. And it shared its offices, management and a shareholder with a twin company called Regent Star Ltd.
Regent Star’s only known business activity was to collect payments from Japanese companies that imported tropical hardwood from Sarawak when Taib Mahmud, says the report, “exerted unfettered control over the Sarawak timber business” as chief minister, minister of resource planning, and chairman of the Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corp.
In 2008, Japan’s national tax tribunal found that nine Japanese shipping companies had paid at least $1.1 billion yen (about $13 million Cdn) to Regent Star based on a 1983 brokerage agreement for the shipping of Sarawak timber, the report says.
The NGO’s allegation is that the payments were received “by the Taib family from the Japanese timber importers.”
“It appears likely that part of the $20-million loan provided to the Sakto Group in 1996 by Jamilah Taib in trust was money paid by Japanese timber importers to the Taib family through Regent Star,” the report says.
The NGO’s analysis of Sakto’s finances is divided into two periods in the report: 1983 to 1993 and 1994 to the present.
For the first decade, much was gleaned from audited financial statements for Sakto Development Corp. held on microfiche by a library in London, Ont. Much less is known about the company’s finances after 1994 because financial statements of non-public companies are usually private. The authors of the report say they also relied on land registry records and a number of public statements by company officials or associated businesses.
The Bruno Manser Fund is a charitable association in Basil, Switzerland, that works to protect the threatened tropical rainforests and rights of indigenous forest peoples in Sarawak. It was founded by Swiss rainforest advocate Bruno Manser, who disappeared in Malaysia in 2000.
Executive director Lukas Straumann, one of the report’s three authors, travelled to Ottawa for its launch. He was joined by representatives from Mining Watch Canada, Canadians for Tax Fairness and the Canadian Network on Corporate Accountability.
The report’s release was used by the groups to demand the federal government strengthen its anti-money laundering legislation and fulfill a campaign promise to create a new, independent ombudsperson to investigate complaints related to natural resource extraction.
In a written statement, International Trade Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the federal government “expects all Canadian firms to operate lawfully and according to Canadian values.
“We recognize there are always improvements to be made. We have met with the Corporate Social Responsibility Counselor to evaluate how to strengthen his role. We continue to meet with Canadian mining companies to discuss how to improve our practices and strengthen the Canadian brand abroad,” the statement said.
Straumann said his Safe Haven Canada report was carefully drafted based on public records he and fellow researchers were able to get their hands on. “We knew we had to do our homework,” he said.
Sakto, he said, has offered no explanation for where its money has come from and has successfully shielded its Canadian assets from scrutiny for more than 30 years because federal privacy laws protect the shareholders and beneficial owners of private corporations.
Straumann called the logging activities in the Borneo rainforest a “man-made tragedy” and added the indigenous people of Sarawak, despite being promised wealth and development, remain among the state’s marginalized poor. “They are not seeing the benefits,” he said.
The Bruno Manser Fund says it first alerted the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) of its concerns about the Taib family in 2010.
The NGO says the Taibs meet the definition of politically exposed foreign persons (PEFPs) due to Abdul Taib Mahmud’s role as head of government of the Malaysian state of Sarawak. The definition also applies to children, spouses and siblings.
Financial transactions with PEFPs are, by definition, high risk with regard to potential money laundering and require enhanced due diligence from financial institutions, the NGO says.
The NGO says neither the federal government nor the RCMP has ever officially investigated Sakto or taken any steps to freeze the company’s assets. In fact, the Attorney General of Ontario is among the provincial government agencies that rent office space from the company at Preston Square.
In a written statement to the Citizen, FINTRAC says it is prohibited under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act from “commenting on any information that it may have received or that it may have disclosed to its police, law enforcement or national security partners.”
The statement further adds FINTRAC is not an investigative agency and has no authority to pursue criminal charges. FINTRAC shares its financial intelligence “when it has reasonable grounds to suspect that the information would be relevant to investigating or prosecuting a money laundering offence or a terrorist activity financing offence.”
A spokesperson for the RCMP would not comment on whether it has ever investigated Sakto. “I can say that generally, only in the event that an investigation results in the laying of criminal charges would the RCMP confirm its investigation, the nature of any charges laid and the identity of the individual(s) involved,” said Sgt. Harold Pfleiderer.
Taib Mahmud has been accused of corruption and abuse of public office. Between 1998 and 2007, the NGO’s report says, Taib family companies were granted land leases for nearly 200,000 hectares of state land worth several hundred million dollars by the Sarawak state government when Taib Mahmud was the minister in charge.
Although Malaysia’s anti-corruption commission opened an investigation into Taib Mahmud in 2011, a Bloomberg report from May 2014 cites a written reply the government agency sent in March 2014 to Malaysian members of parliament saying Taib, Sarawak’s former chief minister, wasn’t involved in decisions to award any project or land to his family members, according to the commission’s findings to that point.


SAMSUNG GALAXY S8: CAN IT STACK UP AGAINST ANDROID RIVALS?

SAMSUNG GALAXY S8: CAN IT STACK UP AGAINST ANDROID RIVALS?






WITH THE Samsung Galaxy S8 release date officially revealed, should you join the pre-order queue, or aim for something else? Express.co.uk runs the rule over Samsung’s major rivals.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is finally here.The South Korean mobile giant revealed its latest flagship smartphone at an event in New York on March 29th after months of speculation.

Set to arrive in shops across the UK on April 28th, the Galaxy S8 comes with a stunning new look, combined with some seriously impressive hardware, as well as the all-new Bixby smart assistant.

However many fans have already baulked at the £689 price tag for the Galaxy S8, which increases to £779 for the Galaxy S8 Plus, with some seeking a cheaper alternative.
But if you aren’t a Samsung fan, or simply don’t fancy waiting another month for the Galaxy S8 release date, what are some of the other top alternatives?



EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a top-end device, but how does it stack up against its rivals?
Google PixelThe Google Pixel was one of the most popular Android phones of last year.
Combining Google’s own specialised design and the most powerful version of Android 7.1 Nougat released to date, the device was hit among media and consumers alike.
The Pixel, and larger Pixel XL, feature a 1080p FullHD AMOLED 5.0in display , which is smaller than the Galaxy S8, but makes it easier to fit in your pocket.
The Pixel is also 12g lighter than the Galaxy S8, however it only comes with Gorilla Glass 4, unlike Samsung’s device, which packs all-new Gorilla Glass 5, meaning it is tougher and stronger.
Inside, both devices feature the Snapdragon 835 processor (at least, one model of the Galaxy S8 does) and 4GB of RAM. However the Pixel is available with 128GB of storage, double the amount offered by the Galaxy S8, meaning more space for your photos, videos and apps.


EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS
The Google Pixel is probably the most powerful Android smartphone around…for now
The Pixel camera is marginally better than the Galaxy S8, with a 12.3MP sensor, and as for battery life, the Galaxy S8 packs a 3,000mAh power unit, just ahead of the Pixel’s 2,700mAh battery, although the latter’s QuickCharge 4.0 technology should help extend its life span.Software-wise, the Pixel holds an advantage, with Google always rolling out the latest version of Android to its own devices first.
This means that the Pixel is currently on Android 7.1.2 Nougat build, giving it the super-powered Google Assistant, and will most likely get upgraded to the forthcoming Android O first.
In contrast, the Galaxy S8 ships with the initial Android 7.0 Nougat build, although it does come with Samsung’s own Bixby assistant.
Crucially, the Pixel is significantly cheaper than the Galaxy S8, currently on sale for £529 – although this is still fairly pricey for an Android flagship.
Overall though, if you’re looking for great usability and powerful software coupled with a gorgeous design, you can’t go far wrong with a Google Pixel.

GETTY

The LG G6 certainly attempts to run the Galaxy S8 close
LG G6The LG G6 was revealed at Mobile World Congress earlier this year to widespread acclaim
LG’s latest smartphone hit the headlines for its stunning lost edge-to-edge ‘FullVision’ display, squeezing a  a massive 5.7-inch screen into a phone that’s considerably smaller than both the 5.5-inch iPhone 7 Plus and Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge.
This meant it stole something of the Galaxy S8’s display thunder, although Samsung’s screen is marginally bigger, and far more detailed, again thanks to its Super AMOLED display.
The G6 falls behind the Galaxy S8 when it comes to hardware, however, with only 32GB of internal storage and 4GB of RAM, all powered by the year-old Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 chip.
This puts it far behind the Galaxy S8 in terms of pure power, which is disappointing.
The G6 does match the Galaxy S8’s 3000mAh battery, however, and does have one extra trick up its sleeve.
LG’s device packs in a dual 13-megapixel cameras on the rear, offering a powerful alternative to the single-lens Galaxy S8 (although things were nearly so different…)
Set to go on sale on April 27th at significantly cheaper than Samsung’s device, the LG G6 is another option if you are watching your funds.


SONY


Sony’s Xperia XZ Premium features an incredibly developed camera
Sony Xperia XZ PremiumSony also made a triumphant return at Mobile World Congress to reveal the Xperia XZ Premium.
Although at first glance it may not look like a competitor to the Galaxy S8, the XZ Premium has one crucial areas where it excels.
That’s because Sony’s company’s new flagship features one of the most powerful cameras ever seen in an Android smartphone, with a 19-megapixel snapper which can shoot video at 960 frames per second.
The camera also includes a clever Motion Eye camera system which can work out what you’re about shoot using something Sony is calling Predictive Capture.
This allows the XZ Premium to stay one step ahead with it automatically buffering images when it detects motion, and should mean a moment is never missed.
The device’s 5.5-inch display is also able to show content in 4K HDR (High Dynamic Range) quality.
Sony’s device also packs the same super-powerful Snapdragon 835 processor as the Galaxy S8, and a bigger 3230 mAh battery with special Stamina mode.
All in all, the Xperia XZ Premium offers comparable hardware to the Galaxy S8 – especially for photo fans.



HUAWEI


The Huawei P10 will be available in several colour schemes
Huawei P10Lastly, among the other top devices revealed at Mobile World Congress was the Huawei P10.
Although arguably the company’s most eye-catching device to date, the P10 only offers a 5.1 FullHD display – far less than the Galaxy S8.
Huawei’s device matches the latest Samsung release with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, however it packs a Kirin 960 processor which is far less powerful than the Galaxy S8’s Snapdragon 835.
The software side also suffers from Huawei’s own fingerprints, with Android 7.0 Nougat installed, but combined with Huawei’s own EMUI interface, which offers more customisation but also much annoying bloatware.
Where the Huawei P10 does stand out though is in its camera, where a Leica-made dual-lens 20MP set-up dwarfs that installed in the Galaxy S8, making this another must-have for photo fans.
Also set to go on sale this month for significantly less than the Galaxy S8, the Huawei P10 is an interesting device, but ultimately falls behind its other big Android rivals.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge showcases water resistant feature
Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeFinally, if none of the above appeal, Samsung’s current flagship device is still pretty handy.
Launched early last year, the Galaxy S7 Edge features a Quad HD display, waterproof design and a dual pixel camera, winning best smartphone of the year at numerous award ceremonies.
This means it may not be as powerful as the new device, although it will still handle most everyday tasks with ease
Best of all, Samsung also recently cut the price of the Galaxy S7 Edge, so it can now be yours for significantly less.
Samsung has slashed the cost of its current flagships with the Galaxy S7 now costing £519 and the S7 Edge available for £589.
With a new cheaper price tag and hardware that’s comparable to many other leading devices out there, it’s hard not to keep recommending the Galaxy S7 Edge if you are in the market for a new Android phone.
– http://www.express.co.uk


‘ELIMINATE’ KIT SIANG & DAP IS NOTHING: TIME FOR DAP CHIEF TO EMPLOY BODYGUARDS OR RISK BEING KIDNAPPED LIKE RAYMOND KOH, PETER CHONG?


Welcome to Crazy Malaysia when anything is possible. This article below is from Malaysia-Today - http://www.malaysia-today.net and the man who owns it is Raja Petra who is a turncoat and now the head propagandist for the Malaysian government ruling party BN. He is slippery and can convince a snake that it has legs and walk

‘ELIMINATE’ KIT SIANG & DAP IS NOTHING: TIME FOR DAP CHIEF TO EMPLOY BODYGUARDS OR RISK BEING KIDNAPPED LIKE RAYMOND KOH, PETER CHONG?




Time and time again Kit Siang has been conning us. And his latest con is Pakatan Harapan is going to make Anwar the Prime Minister if they win the next general election. This is a con and Kit Siang knows it. Kit Siang knows that Pakatan Harapan is never going to win the next general election so Anwar is never going to become Prime Minister.
Lim Kit Siang has been playing his con game for quite a long time and the Chinese voters know this. The problem, though, is Kit Siang is all they have and if they do not throw their support behind him then there is no one else.

Of course, they still have Tan Seng Giaw, a very popular DAP leader, and about five of his ‘team members’ (Teng Chang Khim, Nga Kor Ming, Ngeh Koo Ham, Chow Kon Yeow and Boo Cheng Hau). But then Kit Siang made sure that all these six got killed off by rigging the party election on 15th December 2012 and the reelection on 29th September 2013.


Kit Siang lied and said Superman Hew has resigned from the party but two weeks ago they held a meeting to discuss DAP’s election strategy on how to break up the Malay votes
In fact, the Chinese already knew back in 1999 that Kit Siang and DAP were conning them. And that was why the Chinese voters punished both Kit Siang and Karpal Singh by voting them out in the 29th November 1999 general election. While PAS rode the very strong anti-Mahathir sentiments and swept 27 parliament seats and two states, DAP won a mere ten seats. MCA, in fact, DAP’s nemesis, managed to win 29 seats, a strong message from the Chinese voters that DAP should rethink its strategy or else keep suffering defeat.
Kit Siang knew that their partnership with PAS (the first time ever) to face the 29th November 1999 general election was a huge mistake (on hindsight, that is). So, on 21st September 2001, DAP left the opposition coalition, Barisan Alternatif, on the excuse that it does not agree with PAS’s so-called ‘Islamisation’ policies.
That was actually another Kit Siang con. In 1993, the Kelantan PAS government had tabled the Sharia Amendment Bill in the Kelantan State Assembly. That Bill was still awaiting parliaments’s approval and Kit Siang knew this. And PAS never withdrew that Bill. Yet, in spite of this, in 1999 Kit Siang agreed for DAP to go into partnership with PAS.
So, Kit Siang was conning the Chinese when he told the Chinese that a vote for PAS is a vote for Barisan Alternatif, and hence a vote for DAP as well. But the Chinese voters did not buy that lie. Not only did the Chinese not vote for PAS, they did not vote for Kit Siang, Karpal and DAP as well. And while PAS and PKR did well (because of the Malay votes), DAP did badly in the 1999 general election.

The Chinese voters punished Kit Siang on 29th November 1999 for entering into a partnership with PAS
And that was the main reason why DAP left Barisan Alternatif in 2001. Kit Siang knew that the Chinese would not vote DAP if they were still in partnership with PAS. But Kit Siang could not admit his mistake and do a U-turn. He needed a face-saving excuse to bring DAP out of Barisan Alternatif. And it has to be a new excuse (something that happened after 1999) and not an old excuse (something that happened back in 1993). And that excuse presented itself when PAS tabled the Sharia Amendment Bill in the Terengganu State Assembly in 2001.
So, on 21st September 2001, DAP broke off with PAS by leaving Barisan Alternatif.
It was actually all a drama or wayang. Kit Siang realised, on hindsight, that going into partnership with PAS to face the 29th November 1999 general election was a huge mistake. And the Chinese voters punished him, Karpal and DAP for that mistake. So he has to correct this mistake by bringing DAP out of Barisan Alternatif. But it cannot be seen that the reason DAP is leaving Barisan Alternatif is because it was a mistake for them to go into partnership with PAS in the first place or else Kit Siang and DAP would lose face.
In 1993, PAS passed the Sharia Amendment Bill in the Kelantan State Assembly. In 1999, DAP went into partnership with PAS in spite of that Bill. In 2001, DAP broke up with PAS citing the Terengganu Sharia Amendment Bill as the reason. In 2009, DAP went back into partnership with PAS even though the Sharia Amendment Bill that was passed in the Kelantan State Assembly in 1993 was never withdrawn. In 2015, DAP, yet again, broke up with PAS citing the 1993 Kelantan Sharia Amendment Bill (a.k.a. RUU355) as the reason.
How many cons does Kit Siang hope to play? An even more important question would be how come the Chinese are swallowing these cons after cons hook line and sinker?

Kit Siang promised Mahathir that Mukhriz will be PM and then promised PKR that Anwar will be PM because he knows both will never become PM since Pakatan is not going to win enough seats in the general election
Take the issue of Anwar Ibrahim as the next Prime Minister as another example of Kit Siang’s cons. Kit Siang says he supports Anwar as Prime Minister in the event Pakatan Harapan wins the next general election. That is like promising he will share half his winnings if he wins the lottery. It is easy to make such promises because you know you are never going to win the lottery simply because you have never bought any lottery in your entire life.
All Kit Siang wants is to retain Penang (which is why he is moving to Penang for the next general election). He knows that this is all DAP can expect. With less than 50 parliament seats (or maybe just 45), DAP is never going to be able to form the next federal government. Hence Anwar Ibrahim is never going to become Prime Minister. So what harm is there in promising Anwar the Prime Minister’s post knowing it is never going to happen?
Pakatan Harapan needs to least 115 parliament seats to form the next federal government, to be safe, although a simple majority is only 112. If DAP wins, say, 45 seats, then the rest (such as PKR, PAN, Pribumi and Party Rasuah) would need to win 70 seats. Kit Siang knows this is never going happen because that would mean Sabah and Sarawak (which have 57 seats) would have to fall while Umno must be reduced to just 80 seats.
So, knowing that they do not need to make Anwar the Prime Minister, Kit Siang promises that if Pakatan Harapan wins the next general election Anwar would become the Prime Minister. But he never explains how that is going to happen. And he does not need to explain because he knows it will never happen. So, again, Kit Siang is conning the voters.
Say Pakatan Harapan wins 115 seats in the next general election. What are they then going to do? Are they going to send 100 people armed with guns to the Sungai Buloh Prison and demand that they release Anwar and then bring him to His Majesty the Agong to get sworn in as Prime Minister?

Kit Siang says Anwar is going to become Pakatan’s PM in 2017-2018 but then he is in jail and cannot contest the by-election until after 2025
But then, to become Prime Minister, you must first be elected as a Member of Parliament. So how is that going to happen? Are they going to do another ‘Kajang Move’ and ask one of the PKR Members of Parliament to resign so that a by-election can be held and then Anwar will contest that by-election (which, of course, he must win before he can become Prime Minister).
But then Anwar will be barred from contesting the election until five years after he serves his sentence, which means at the very earliest in 2025. So, if the general election is held this year, Anwar has to wait another eight years to contest the by-election. And that would mean one more general election after the 2017-2018 general election will need to be held before the by-election for Anwar to contest can he held.
So, in the meantime, for eight years, Anwar cannot become the Prime Minister. Hence what happens in the meantime during those eight years? Does someone else become a temporary Prime Minister who warms the seat for the next eight years while we wait for Anwar to take over?

Has Kit Siang already arranged for His Majesty the Agong to grant Anwar a pardon?
For Anwar to be able to contest the general election early, say within three months after the next general election, he must first obtain a pardon from His Majesty the Agong. How are they going to get the Agong to grant Anwar the pardon? After sending 100 armed men to the Sungai Buloh Prison to break Anwar out of jail, are these 100 armed men then going to march to the Agong’s palace and at gunpoint force His Majesty to sign the papers granting Anwar a pardon? Or are they first going to force the Agong to grant Anwar a pardon and after that march to the Sungai Buloh Prison with the pardon papers?

Now, since Kit Siang says Anwar must be freed from prison and made the Prime Minister in the event Pakatan Harapan wins the next general election, is Kit Siang then saying Anwar is innocent and the judge fixed him up in a sham trial? Does this mean the judge who sentenced Anwar is dishonest, a crook, or had been bought? If so, and if Anwar is therefore innocent and a victim of a sham trial, should not then Kit Siang promise Malaysians that once Pakatan Harapan takes over this judge is going to be arrested and is going to be charged and sent to jail?
Yes, Kit Siang does not explain all this. And he need not explain all this because he knows Anwar is never going to become Prime Minister. Kit Siang is just conning us. He has been conning us so many times since 1999. And this is yet another of his many cons.
Raja Petra Kamarudin


http://www.malaysia-today.net

First ‘Silk Road’ train from Britain leaves for China

First ‘Silk Road’ train from Britain leaves for China

 | April 10, 2017
The train will go through the Channel Tunnel before travelling across France, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan before heading into China.



STANDFORD-LE-HOPE: The first-ever freight train from Britain to China, laden with whisky, soft drinks and baby products, started its mammoth journey on Monday along a modern-day “Silk Road” trade route.

The 32-container train, around 600 metres (yards) long, left from the vast London Gateway container port on the River Thames estuary, bound for Yiwu on the Chinese east coast.
It was seen off on its 18-day, 12,000-kilometre (7,500-mile) journey with a string quartet, British and Chinese flags, and speeches voicing hope that it will cement a new golden age of trade between the two countries as the UK leaves the European Union.
The first train from China to Britain arrived on January 18, filled with clothes and other retail goods, and Monday’s departure was the first journey in the other direction.
The rail route is cheaper than air freight and faster than sea freight, offering logistics companies a new middle option.

The driver gave a thumbs-up and tooted his horn as he got the wagons rolling at the port in Stanford-le-Hope, east of London.

The train will go through the Channel Tunnel before travelling across France, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan before heading into China.
The containers will be taken off and put on different wagons at the Belarus border, as the former Soviet Union countries use a wider rail gauge.
The containers switch back to standard gauge rails at the Chinese border, an operation that typically takes around two hours.

“We are proud to be able to offer the first ever UK to China export train,” said Xubin Feng, the chairman of Yiwu Timex Industrial Investment.

“Restoring the ancient Silk Road as a means by which China, north Europe and now the UK can exchange goods is an important and exciting initiative.
“This is the first export train and just the start of a regular direct service between the UK and China. We have great faith in the UK as an export nation and rail provides an excellent alternative for moving large volumes of goods over long distances faster.”

SHOCK EXPOSE – WHAT NAJIB REGIME TRIED TO HIDE FROM THE WORLD: ‘IT WAS ALL IN DOLLARS & EUROS’ – MALAYSIAN FIRM FUNNELLED MONEY TO HELP FUND N. KOREA’S LEADERSHIP

SHOCK EXPOSE – WHAT NAJIB REGIME TRIED TO HIDE FROM THE WORLD: ‘IT WAS ALL IN DOLLARS & EUROS’ – MALAYSIAN FIRM FUNNELLED MONEY TO HELP FUND N. KOREA’S LEADERSHIP


KUALA LUMPUR – Over the past two decades, North Korean-born Han Hun Il, the founding chief executive of a Malaysian conglomerate, funnelled money to the leadership in Pyongyang, a North Korean defector, speaking out for the first time, told Reuters.
Han’s conglomerate, Malaysia Korea Partners (MKP), worked in partnership with Jang Song Thaek, according to Lee Chol Ho, who worked as a trader for Han for nine years until he defected to Seoul in 2010. Jang, the uncle of North Korea’s ruler Kim Jong Un, was considered one of North Korea’s most powerful men until he was executed for treason in 2013.

Reuters was unable to independently confirm Lee’s account of Han’s relationship with North Korea’s leadership, including his assertion that money was funnelled to North Korea’s leadership body, the central committee of the ruling Workers’ Party.
Reuters also couldn’t determine how the central committee, which controls North Korea’s highly sanctioned nuclear and weapons programme, used the funds from Han or if the payments are continuing.
The new disclosures come at a time when United Nations sanctions monitors are intensifying scrutiny of both Han and MKP.
A February report by experts monitoring UN sanctions on North Korea says MKP’s bank subsidiary in Pyongyang is a particular focus. A 2013 UN resolution bars foreign companies or foreign joint ventures with a North Korean company from having a financial subsidiary in North Korea.
The UN report says the bank, called International Consortium Bank, was established as a joint venture between MKP and Jang’s Sungri Economic Group. The bank is licensed by North Korea’s central bank and registered with the Pyongyang Municipal People’s Committee, it said.
If the UN experts find sanctions have been violated, they could recommend the UN Security Council blacklist MKP, its executives or one or more of its subsidiaries, subjecting them to a global travel ban and asset freeze.
Strained ties
Han, also known as Dr Edward Hahn, hung up the phone and blocked a Reuters reporter on his messaging app when contacted for comment.
MKP did not respond to requests for comment on Lee’s assertions. The company issued a statement dated March 23 saying MKP had “no reason to hide the fact” that Han is North Korean. It denied owning ICB or any other North Korean bank and said nobody from the United Nations has contacted the company.
The UN said it does not comment on its ongoing investigations.







Lee’s description of how MKP operated appears to shed fresh light on the close ties between Malaysia and North Korea, which have come under strain following the assassination of Kim Jong Nam, the elder half-brother of North Korea’s ruler, with the highly toxic VX nerve agent in February.
Reuters reported in February that North Korea’s spy agency was running an arms export operation out of Malaysia.

Malaysia’s foreign ministry did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.
Pyongyang bank

MKP, which Han formed in 1996 with his Malaysian partner, Yong Kok Yeap, operates in 20 countries in Asia, Africa and the Middle East, piling up contracts worth at least US$350 million (RM1.55 billion), an MKP corporate video and promotional brochures shows.
Yong declined requests to be interviewed.
MKP’s main business is construction, but it is also involved in a number of other activities, including financial services and coal trading, according to U.N. reports, company sources, registration documents and MKP promotional material.

ICB is among several banks the UN is currently investigating for possible breaches of various UN Security Council resolutions. These include one from 2013 calling on members states to prohibit financial service companies where there are “reasonable grounds to believe that such financial services could contribute to [North Korea’s] nuclear or ballistic weapons programmes.”
In its March 23 statement, MKP said its website had been “hacked” to insert ICB under its list of service companies and place a “doctored photograph” of “MKP personnel,” including Yong, visiting ICB’s office in Pyongyang.

A search of archive.org, a database of old websites, shows ICB has been listed on MKP’s website since 2009, including under its earlier name, Sungri Hi-Fund International Bank. As of April 10, ICB was still listed on the website.
In its February report, the UN said it had inquired with Malaysia and MKP about ICB and had “yet to receive a reply.”

‘Control tower’
Lee said Han had used MKP as the “control tower” of a vast business empire, making him one of the isolated country’s richest men. He said Han began his career in Africa with North Korea’s Reconnaissance Bureau, its premier spy agency.

“When people from the Central Committee visited Malaysia, they only met with Han,” Lee said. “They didn’t even bother to see the ambassador.”

The Central Committee directs the development and financing of North Korea’s nuclear and missile programmes, said Michael Madden, a North Korea expert at Johns Hopkins University’s 38 North website.

Once a year, Lee said, high-ranking Pyongyang officials travelled to Kuala Lumpur to meet Han and instruct him to wire money to North Korea via banks in Malaysia.
“It was all dollars and euros,” said Lee.

Lee said Han was part of Jang’s overseas network of businessmen.
Two current company sources said MKP’s fortunes — with the exception of its African businesses — declined after 2013 and Han became an infrequent visitor to Malaysia. They said they didn’t know whether the downturn was related to Jang’s demise.
— Reuters 

NASHA? HASAN ALI? : MAN WHO RECEIVED 1MDB MONEY FOR PAS WAS AN EX-PARTY LEADER, HE IS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN UMNO & PAS – RAFIZI DROPS BOMBSHELL

NASHA? HASAN ALI? : MAN WHO RECEIVED 1MDB MONEY FOR PAS WAS AN EX-PARTY LEADER, HE IS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN UMNO & PAS – RAFIZI DROPS BOMBSHELL




Shedding a little more light on his startling claim that a person close to PAS had received 1MDB funds, PKR vice-president Rafizi Ramli said this was a former top ranking leader in the Islamist party.

“He has been a bridge between Umno and PAS,” the Pandan lawmaker told Malaysiakini

Rafizi also claimed this individual had been admonished by the late PAS spiritual leader Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat on several occasions for attempting to forge ties between Umno and PAS.
However, still holding the cards close to his chest, the PKR leader said he would expose the details later this week.
Quizzed on how serious is the evidence he has in his possession, Rafizi replied: “I think it will refocus everything and the cover-up on 1MDB. It will bring back the focus to 1MDB.”
The government has denied that there has been a cover-up in the 1MDB issue despite the wealth fund being the subject of numerous international investigations, and several people being charged in connection with the case in Singapore.

Act 355 comes first

Meanwhile, Rafizi said he has to wait several days before revealing more details because he wanted to explain the Islamic perspective of ongoing attempts to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 (Act 355).
He said Muslims must know that there is a lot more to the debate on this issue then what was portrayed by Umno.

“After this, if I reveal the person, the people will better understand the situation,” he added.
Last week, Rafizi caused a stir when he claimed to have evidence of an individual, whom he described as being close to PAS, having received the funds from Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s accounts.

He challenged PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang to respond to the issue.
Rafizi’s allegation came on the last day of the March-April Dewan Rakyat meeting after speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia deferred the debate on Hadi’s motion to amend Act 355.
PAS leaders have denied Rafizi’s allegation and challenged him to file a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), if he has the proof as claimed.However, Rafizi claimed that MACC had already established this in its course of investigating 1MDB.
Najib has also denied abusing public funds for personal gain, and claimed that the RM2.6 billion in his personal accounts was a donation from a Saudi royalty and did not originate from 1MDB.
Attorney-general Mohamed Apandi Ali has also cleared the prime minister of any wrongdoing.
MKINI

ARE WE RESPONSIBLE ROAD USERS? ANOTHER RECKLESS MALAYSIAN DRIVER CAUGHT DRIVING AGAINST TRAFFIC!

Are we responsible road users? Another reckless Malaysian driver caught driving against traffic!


It got your blood boiling, didn’t it, the case of the girl in Penang that was high on drugs driving on the opposite side of the highway, leaving a trail of destruction and killing an innocent man? Before we even get a chance to settle, here’s another case of a motorist driving on the opposite side of the road.
Apparently, the video was taken by a dashboard camera on Jacky’s vehicle as he was driving.
The video shows a black Perodua Myvi driving on the opposite side of a fairly busy road, approaching a traffic light cross junction. 
While the recent Penang case was of a woman that was not thinking straight (reportedly high on drugs and fleeing an earlier accident), there’s no way this Johor driver isn’t conscious of what he/she was doing!
Said Jacky in an accompanying caption:
“Is this how drivers these days drive?”
The video has also enraged netizens, many of whom felt the driver’s actions were reckless and uncalled for.
Said one netizen:
“If someone sees this driver, please treat him to a slap or punch to wake him up.”
The exact venue and timing of the video cannot be ascertained. 

Watch the full video here:


11-Year-Old Boy Who Is A Victim Of Circumstances Desperately Wants To Be A Malaysian Citizen!

11-Year-Old Boy Who Is A Victim Of Circumstances Desperately Wants To Be A Malaysian Citizen!





I truly sympathise for this boy, he is being bullied by his school friends all because he doesn’t own a MyKad or any other identification card for that matter. In the past two years, he had shown significant changes and it’s not the positives ones. According to his father, he is becoming more unsociable and his grades have dropped down by quite a lot.
This is all happening because he was born to a Malaysian father and Indonesian mother. Jia Yi who is about to turn 12 was not granted his citizenship as he was born a day before his parents registered their marriage.
Tan Ban Guan (father) apparently had been trying to get their marriage registered for months but kept facing difficulties but eventually, when they could do it at the National Registration Department in Ipoh on July 26, 2005, his wife was due for labour on the same day!
The couple even rushed back to the NRD after safely delivering the child but was brushed off by the officer as he was about to go home and was told to come the next day, which they did.
Jia Yi’s father who is a part-time mosaic layer and odd job worker had been trying to submit his son’s application for citizenship for 3 times over the last 4 years. The poor boy doesn’t even have Indonesian citizenship as his mother had not registered the boy’s birth in her country.
The boy now is just desperate to get his citizenship as his other 3 younger siblings have them. He is also a very good volleyball player according to his coach, but unfortunately, he can’t represent the State as he doesn’t have a place where he belongs to that is stated in a sheet of paper.
His parents are now worrying over his future!
“What’s going to happen when he comes of age?”
“He won’t be able to further his education, neither can he gain legal employment.”
Jia Yi is completely aware of his situation and according to The Star, this was what he had to say regarding the matter:
“I want to be a Malaysian like my siblings and friends. I am just like them, except that I do not have a MyKid.”
“I want to continue attending school and one day represent the country in volleyball.”
Hope Jia Yi gets his own MyKad soon and becomes an excellent volleyball player who will make Malaysia proud!




[VIDEO] Spooky CCTV Footage Caught Glass Door In Malacca Police Station Opening By Itself!!

[VIDEO] Spooky CCTV Footage Caught Glass Door In Malacca Police Station Opening By Itself!!





This is so spooky! On Thursday at about 4.21 am, footage of 2 glass doors in Bandar Hilir police station, Malacca, opened by itself before one of them broke was caught on CCTV. The video was uploaded on social media and is going viral.
There were 3 policemen at the counter when the incident took place. Malacca police chief Asst Comm Shaikh Abdul Adzis Shaikh Abdullah said they haven’t received a report on the incident but was shocked at how the CCTV footage went viral on the internet.

“I have confirmed that the doors in the police station opened and one broke but I have not received any reports just yet. The incident may be affected by wind pressure, and I am still waiting for the reports from the policemen present at the scene,” he said.
Asst Comm Shaikh Abdul said that investigations are being carried out to find out how the recordings of a CCTV footage in a police station became viral on social media.
Here is the video footage,



I don’t think that wind pressure is so strong to smack the door open so fast like that.

Shocking Videos Show A Chinese Boy Being Brutally Beaten Up By Bullies In School Dorm

Shocking Videos Show A Chinese Boy Being Brutally Beaten Up By Bullies In School Dorm


Two shocking footages of bullies brutally abusing a helpless victim surfaced on Facebook last week — and they’re all school kids! The exact date the video was recorded is not known.
The heartbreaking videos show a teen from Hainan, China being badly beaten up by a a group of bullies in school dormitory. Three heartless boys are seen taking turns to whack the helpless victim, punching, kneeing and kicking him to the ground!
The bullies, however, are unlikely to receive punishment as China’s criminal justice system does punish minors unless for severe cases such as murder or arson.
If you are being bullied no matter what GET HELP. A lot of the time it’s hard to get help and you don’t want to make the situation worse. But I promise if you do get help, it really will get better. Talk to a friend, a parent, sibling, anyone you trust. But remember that letting it go on will be worse than telling someone.
Here are the two disturbing video clips:




Innocent Life Fell Victim To Neighbor’s False Accusation Of Selling Drugs!!

Innocent Life Fell Victim To Neighbor’s False Accusation Of Selling Drugs!!



Drug distributors, sellers, and addicts in the Philippines are constantly targeted. One innocent life lost to gunmen hunting for people involved with drugs with or without evidence.
Luzviminda Siapo who was working in Kuwait from 2 years ago received a message about her son’s fate from her niece on Facebook saying “Tita, Raymart’s gone. Bonnet-wearing men killed him.”
On March 29, a group of men in ski masks abducted and killed her 19-year-old son, Raymart, a day after a neighbor tagged him as a marijuana peddler in Barangay NBBS, Navotas City.


Siapo, a single parent, said in an interview, “All it took was a false accusation for these people to murder my son, they did not bother to investigate nor did they bother to verify, they just killed him.”
It was reported that the night before the murder, Raymart had an altercation with a neighbor that ended with the latter going to the barangay hall to accuse Raymart of many things, like selling marijuana. The neighbor, identified only as Pejie, said his piece before desk officer Christopher Cariquitan, who had everything recorded in the logbook.

The next night, armed men on motorbikes showed up at Siapo’s home looking for the teenager. Up to 14 men arrived and 5 of them entered their target’s house as witnessed by Raymart’s uncle who serves as his guardian.
They couldn’t find Raymart in his home but later found him at a friend’s house nearby, they forced Raymart to ride with the group. He was last heard crying for help from anyone he saw on the street. They went around the barangay until they reached an area known as Bangkulasi.
“When my son refused, they asked him to sit down instead. Then, they shot him. Just like that,” Siapo said.
When Raymart was told to get off the motorcycle and run, he wouldn’t and couldn’t even if he wanted to as he was born with bilateral clubfoot (both feet were deformed). A Navotas police report said Raymart was shot twice in the head, his mother added a painful detail where the killers even broke her son’s arms!
“I’m working hard abroad just so I could raise my kids well. But this is what I’d come home to? My dead child!” said Siapo, who arrived from Kuwait on April 2.
Siapo’s employer reluctantly allowed her employee to return to her home country in the condition that she has to leave her belongings behind as a guarantee of her to return to Kuwait. Siapo went to the extent of getting down on her knees to kiss her employer’s feet to get some time off. Her brother, Bong, greeted her at the airport.
Siapo headed straight to the barangay hall, where she confronted village officials including Cariquitan, the desk officer, for allowing the neighbor to make false accusations against Raymart for not bothering to check if they were true.
“This is the reason why my son was murdered, sir, tell me what to do. Tell me! Because I had to kneel down and kiss my employer’s feet three times before I could come home. Give me an answer, please,” she said.
Cariquitan suggested that Siapo lodge a formal complaint in the police station, assuring her of the barangay’s assistance in pressing charges.
Siapo proceeded to her son’s wake from the barangay hall. Slowly, she walked up towards the while coffin, hugged it as she wept once more saying “Son, Mama’s home!”


Pejie, Raymart’s accuser had disappeared from the neighborhood since the killing. Raymart was buried at Lourdes cemetery in Malabon City yesterday April 9, 2017.


Traitors in the midst of Pakatan Harapan and mostly in DAP

Traitors in Pakatan Harapan , yes many are and do not realize they will be the ones because they are already been compromised during to the...

Popular Post