Pages

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

France Could Elect A President With Seriously Troubling Ideas About Religion

Marine Le Pen has championed secularism at the expense of religious minorities.




Marine Le Pen, French National Front political party leader and candidate for French 2017 presidential election, delivers a speech after early results in the first round of the election Sunday in Henin-Beaumont, France.

Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s far-right, anti-immigrant National Front party, came in second place Sunday in the country’s first round of voting in the presidential election.

The presidency now depends on a May 7 runoff election between Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron, an independent, centrist candidate who is being supported by French and European politicians across the political spectrum.

Le Pen is the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen, who helped found the National Front. Marine Le Pen took control of the party in 2011 and has tried to distance herself politically from her father’s racist and openly anti-Semitic views, going so far as to help push him out of the party in 2015. In just a few years, she’s helped to transform the National Front from a fringe party to a serious contender for political power in France.

But Le Pen’s rise to power doesn’t necessarily bode well for France’s religious minorities. Le Pen claims she’s not “waging a religious war,” but she has championed French secularism at the expense of religious minorities’ ability to express their faith in public. 

Below, The Huffington Post has gathered just seven of the troubling ideas Le Pen has espoused about religious minorities. From her bashing of Muslim women who wear the headscarf, to her calculated attempts to pit French Jews against French Muslims, Le Pen’s past comments make it clear if she wins it would become even harder for France’s religious minorities to practice their faith. 

She compared Muslims praying in the streets to the Nazi occupation. 

During a National Front rally in 2010, Le Pen responded to reports of Muslims praying in public in French cities with a disturbing comparison. The Muslims had reportedly turned to public spaces because of a lack of space in local mosques.

“I’m sorry, but for those who really like to talk about the Second World War, if we’re talking about occupation, we can also talk about this while we’re at it, because this is an occupation of territory,” Le Pen reportedly said during the rally.

“It’s an occupation of swaths of territory, of areas in which religious laws apply … for sure, there are no tanks, no soldiers, but it’s an occupation all the same and it weighs on people.”

She was charged with inciting hatred after those comments, and later acquitted. 


PASCAL ROSSIGNOL / REUTERS

A woman walks past official posters of candidates for the 2017 French presidential election at a local market in Bethune, France.

She can’t seem to distinguish between terrorism and religion.

During and after the American presidential elections, U.S. President Donald Trump promised that he would name and eradicate what he called “radical Islamic terrorism.” His use of the phrase was a departure from the strategies of former presidents Barack Obama and George Bush ― both of whom avoided using a term that linked violence propagated by terrorists to the religious beliefs of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims.

Le Pen has her own version of the phrase ― she calls it “Islamic fundamentalism.” In an op-ed for The New York Times in January 2015, written days after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, Le Pen criticized French officials for refusing to link the terrorist attacks to Islam. 

“Let us call things by their rightful names, since the French government seems reluctant to do so. France, land of human rights and freedoms, was attacked on its own soil by a totalitarian ideology: Islamic fundamentalism,” she wrote.


She has applauded Trump’s Muslim ban.

After Trump signed an executive order restricting refugee admissions from seven Muslim-majority countries in January, a member of Le Pen’s campaign said that the National Front would be open to issuing a similar ban in France. 

“And why not?” Steeve Briois, National Front’s vice president, told Agence France-Presse. “We are no longer in the world of the Care Bears. We are in a horrible world, so sometimes you have to take measures of authority, even if it shocks.”

Le Pen herself has applauded the travel ban. 

“I think Donald Trump and his intelligence services wanted to set up criteria and conditions to avoid having potential terrorists enter the United States, where they might commit attacks, the same way that France was the victim of attacks,” she told CNN.


CHARLES PLATIAU / REUTERS

Marine Le Pen (L), a candidate for France’s presidential election, casts her ballot in the first round of the election at a polling station in Henin-Beaumont, northern France, on Sunday.

She doesn’t think Muslim women who wear the headscarf can be truly French. 

Although Le Pen has tried to paint herself as being opposed to “Islamic fundamentalism,” it’s clear from her language about Muslim women that she sees Islam itself as a problem.

In an interview with Anderson Cooper last month, Le Pen reiterated her stance against the headscarf some Muslim women wear as part of their religious practice. 

“I’m opposed to wearing headscarves in public places. That’s not France,” she said in the interview. “There’s something I just don’t understand: The people who come to France, why would they want to change France, to live in France the same way they lived back home?’

The headscarf has long been a subject of debate in France. Hijabs and other religious articles of clothing were banned from public schools in 2004. In 2011, France banned women from wearing full-face veils in public places ― even though only about 2,000 of France’s 5 million Muslims are believed to wear full veils.

During her campaign, Le Pen has consistently presented Islam as a religion that is inherently unfriendly toward women.

During a rally last week, she said, “In France, we respect women, we don’t beat them, we don’t ask them to hide themselves behind a veil as if they were impure.”

She doesn’t think France should be held responsible for its participation in the Holocaust. 

In 1942, French police rounded up more than 13,000 Jewish men, women and children at a sporting arena in Paris, many of whom were then sent to their deaths at Auschwitz. 

Earlier this month, Le Pen stated that she doesn’t think France is responsible for that raid, which was ordered by Nazi officers. 

“I think that generally speaking if there are people responsible, it’s those who were in power at the time. It’s not France,” she said.

Former French presidents have assumed the opposite position, apologizing formally for the roundup.

Le Pen’s opponent in the French election, Emmanuel Macron, said her comments reflect the fact that she is still her father’s daughter.

Jean-Marie Le Pen has been convicted numerous times of contesting crimes against humanity for claiming that the gas chambers used to kill Jewish people during the Holocaust were a mere “detail” of history.


CHARLES PLATIAU / REUTERS

Marine Le Pen (C), French National Front (FN) political party leader and candidate for French 2017 presidential election poses in front of her campaign headquarters in Paris, France, April 24, 2017.

She believes Jews shouldn’t wear kippas in public. 

Le Pen has attempted to disentangle herself from her father’s blatant anti-Semitism ― sometimes by pitting French Jews against Muslims.

In an interview with Israel’s Channel 2 News, she said she believes French Jews should be willing to sacrifice their ability to wear kippas in order to join in a “struggle against radical Islam.” Le Pen, who believes no one should wear outwardly religious clothing in public, portrayed Jews giving up their religious symbols as a necessary and patriotic “sacrifice.” 

“I mainly think the struggle against radical Islam should be a joint struggle and everyone should say, ‘There, we are sacrificing something,’” Le Pen said in 2015. “Maybe they will do with just wearing a hat, but it would be a step in the effort to stamp out radical Islam in France.”

She’s actually glad when religious minorities don’t speak up. 

When Anderson Cooper asked Le Pen if Sikhs should be allowed to wear turbans, she responded, “No, not in public.”

Her response was reflective of how little she cared about the protection of religious minorities’ ability to practice their faith.

“We don’t have a lot of Sikhs in France. We’ve got some. But we don’t really hear much from them or about them. Which is good news.”

The remarks have left Sikhs in France worried about the future ― and wondering if they should leave France if Le Pen wins the presidency. 

“For me France will not be a welcoming country for Sikhs and any people who want to live his or her religion freely,” Talwinder Kaur, a Sikh mother living in France, told NDTV. 

Malaysian General Election PRU/GE 14 Lesson 4 - Who you vote is who you going to get

Malaysian General Election PRU/GE 14 Lesson 4 - If you vote in a Candidate who is a thief , conman , corrupted ,liar , religious bigot , that is who you going to get.


Use your vote wisely at the Ballot box.


Most of the above reside at the below and when see the below symbol at the Ballot box voting slip, please avoid it because it is bad medicine for the health of Malaysia and its good citizens and the future of Malaysia

"MALAYSIA MUST BE AN APPLE AND NOT A KODAK"



Can We Be True To Ourselves Everyday

By: Ravindran Raman Kutty

KUALA LUMPUR (Bernama)

The anticipation that the elections will be held soon seems to attract many good things which we Malaysians either take for granted or simply ignore, with the assumption that "Ini semua biasa, a common practice during election season.

This year, celebrations of Good Friday, Easter, Hindu New Year and Vaisakhi (the Sikh New Year), by mere coincidence, shared the same date. In the past, these festivals were either celebrated on a quiet scale or simply overlooked by the authorities. However, this year, the entrance of my township was adorned with banners and posters of such festivals, adding colours and flavours to the environment.

Although a beautiful sight for all, why such emphasis on multi-multiculturalism and multi-religiosity only when election season is in the air? No doubt many would consider this as an election ploy or vote-garnering exercise amongst our elected politicians and to-be elected candidates. If only such diversity was understood by everyone and be made a daily practice, especially the politicians who govern us.

Election season is also noted in our calendars as road refurbishment season, whereby all our roads are re-tarred and re-paved. Even the smallest holes are not left uncovered. The smell of hot tar and the sounds of bulldozers fill the air for many days and weeks prior to the election date.

However, it would be a great improvement for the municipal and other governing authorities to realize that potholes in streets as well as other maintenance required issues of our roads occur throughout the year and not only during election season.

If issues surrounding faulty street lamps and traffic lights, leaking sewerage holes, overgrown grass and broken branches, poor waste collection and clearing of dead carcasses on the street were also collectively and efficiently attended to immediately and public amenities were maintained on a regular basis, no doubt our nation would shine in cleanliness, hygiene and beauty throughout the year and not just for a specific time or occasion.

Another striking point is the sudden emphasis and attention towards the vernacular schools. The education syllabus and system of the Chinese schools and Tamil schools will become instant issues of interest to all politicians, but again, only during election season, with the main intention to woo non-Malay votes, and our clever politicians never seems to let this topic to rest.

Somewhere after elections, you can hear the firebrands speaking of their closure and that the national unity is ruined by the presence of these vernacular schools. You can see debates and scores of postings online on the need to close these schools, but everything will settle-in well close to the election!

It is also during this time that our national leaders will announce and stress on the utmost importance of unity; that we are a multi-racial and multi-religious, although Islam is the official religion of our nation. Should this not, in actual fact, be said and practiced widely on a daily basis by all? Should equal importance and respect not be given to every ethnic community in this nation? There would be no need for the nation s leaders to emphasize on such issues if these issues itself were inclusive in their daily agenda.

Although we have adapted well to the Bumiputra agenda, we do not have to put up with the practice of non-Bumiputras being side-tracked, ignored and in some cases, rejected or even shoo-ed out of the picture. Every ethnic community in this country is to be given an equal amount of respect and importance in building a nation truly known as Malaysia.

Malaysia boasts of a nation with 98 percent being educated and literate. We need new thoughts in governing and ruling the nation. We cannot be using outdated techniques or outmoded issues. The Generation Y and Z are already becoming 80% of the voters for the coming elections.

We need to close out issues like intended closures or removals of vernacular schools. The constitutional powers of an education minister to close them must be reviewed and renewed. This will help everyone to assimilate and move on faster with greater confidence and trust in the government and education system. National schools must also show greater transparency in managing and adopting true assimilation of our culture, as our Deputy Prime Minister has pointed out that the current education system is not creating much patriotism among Malaysians.

The issues of every ethnicity must be carefully studied; adequate resources and support must be provided to build a strong and strategic Malaysia in meeting the growing "innovative destructive economy". Malaysia cannot be a Kodak. She must be an Apple who will be an enabler for our nation to greater heights. We must strive to restore confidence among the non-Malay voters by considering their needs and grievances in order to maintain a balance among all races and communities that make up this country.

Our loss is another s gain. For instance, the closing of the MRO in Subang by MAS is the biggest gain of Emirates Air where now there is a Malaysian Village in Emirates Air. We should think of our nation first before we think of anyone person, ethnicity or even religion. We must move beyond race and religion to build a nation which will stand strong and firm for the coming generations.

Let's be objective. No more parochialism but patriotism in uniting to meet the external challenges that is coming in a big way. China's new success is brought about by their openness and willingness to collaborate with all walk of life wherever and whenever possible, even forcing the United States to take a back seat. Such is the issue within our country. It is a question of willingness to learn and make a difference or remain a nation only seen campaigning on the eve of every election but not executing the common good, brought about by our diversity and plurality.

Let' s be honest, open and inclusive of every Malaysian s concern. Let' s not just deliver the goodies on the eve of an election, but continuously deliver the goodies equally to every Malaysian in every nook and corner of our nation in order to win back their confidence and trust.

(This commentary is based on the writer s personal opinion and does not in anyway reflect on Bernama s stand on what has been said by the writer)

-- BERNAMA

South Korea develops artillery-locating radar



SEOUL, South Korea — The South Korean military has developed its own artillery-locating radar system to help counter North Korea’s long-range artillery deployed along the Demilitarized Zone separating the two countries. 

The mobile fire-finder radar is to be deployed in the field next year, the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, or DAPA, said Monday. 

“During last trials, the counter-artillery detection radar met all of the required operational capabilities of the armed forces,” DAPA said in a statement. “Now the weapons system is fit for combat use.” 

The radar was co-developed by the state-funded Agency for Defense Development and LIG Nex1, an electronics weapons maker, after six years of research and development. About 54 billion won (U.S. $48 million) was spent to develop the homemade counter-artillery radar, the statement said. 

“With the successful development of the Korean-version counter-battery radar, our military has secured capabilities to immediately destroy enemy’s artillery provocation,” said Army Col. Kim Dong-ho of DAPA’s counter-artillery weapons systems bureau. 

If the North fires cannons and rockets toward the South, the new radar will be able to detect the artillery projectiles and identify from where the shells were fired, Kim noted, adding that the information will immediately be sent to Army units to support counterattacks. 


“The new radar’s detection range is about 60 kilometers, which is further away from the existing ARTHUR-K radar with the range of 40 kilometers,” he said. 

He also said the new radar can operate for about eight hours in a row — two more hours than the ARTHUR-K, which LIG Nex1 produced under a license agreement with Sweden’s Saab. 

The South Korean Army operates about 20 ARTHUR-K radars and a dozen AN/TPQ-36/37 fire-finder radars that were introduced in the early 1990s. 

While North Korea’s massive forces are, for the most part, primitively equipped, Pyongyang possesses the capacity to launch a catastrophic artillery strike on the South Korean capital of Seoul. 

Most of the artillery equipment is already in place, camouflaged and dug in. The communist state’s artillery systems include the 170mm Koksan, which has a range of about 250 miles. Some estimates indicate the capital city could be hit by more than half a million shells in less than an hour. 

It’s Pretty Hard To Make A List Of Trump’s ‘100 Days’ Accomplishments, Apparently

Mike Allen takes his best shot, comes up with Gorsuch and “normal.”
By Jason Linkins

This Saturday, President Donald Trump will mark his 100th day in office, which will generate a swell of “first 100 days” media content, after which we will all move on from day-counting until we’re two years away from the midterm election, at which point we’ll all become insufferable again. Sorry.

Over at Axios, Mike Allen has taken his best shot at summing up Trump’s first 100 days. In the name of balance, he’s gone with a “hits and misses” format, offering five examples of each. But I don’t know, guys. You tell me if these Trump accomplishments are, like, a little bit of a stretch, or if we’re at Reed Richards levels here. Per Allen:

Winning confirmation of Justice Gorsuch: Trump did it fast, with little drama and huge consequence. The win tipped the Court, invigorated conservatives, and bought him credibility with the establishment. It’s the president’s one achievement so far that will outlast him, regardless of what else unfolds.OK, well, this one was unquestionably an accomplishment for Trump. From the point of view of Republicans, Gorsuch is a genuinely appropriate pick who will advance their judicial interests. Had any other of the GOP’s nominees ascended to the White House, you could imagine Gorsuch being on their shortlists as well. Insofar as there were any histrionics, they all happened in the Senate ― beginning, of course, with the actions of GOP senators in keeping this Supreme Court seat vacant in the first place. 

Pro-business executive orders and regulatory changes: Nothing lifts a presidency (or increases the chance of reelection) more than a rising economy. Trump’s early pro-business rhetoric and assault on regulations has boosted many industries. And the market “Trump bump” has given business a new spring in its step.

That’s... one way of looking at it, I guess? Coal companies can pollute more freely now, that’s for sure. Additionally, Trump delayed the implementation of a fiduciary rule proposed during the Obama administration, and that’ll definitely put a “spring in the step” of the Wall Street financial advisers who scam retirees out of some $17 billion each year. I might be more inclined to cynically count these as “hits” if they matched Trump’s populist campaign rhetoric. Alas, they do not.

Encouraging CEOs to think more systematically about American jobs: Businesses talk openly about trying to “bait” a positive tweet from Trump (or insulate themselves from assault) by announcing factory openings or job expansions. These overtures aren’t always all that they seem: Some were already in the pipeline, or may never come to fruition. But he has forced huge companies to reckon with the issue.

This is where the need to put five things on the “hits” side of ledger becomes a problem. I think what Allen is getting at here is that Trump’s ability to roil markets and stir public sentiment on Twitter has created a little uncertainty for firms. We’ve certainly seen some temporary stock shocks since he’s become president. Hedge fund quants have worked on creating algorithms to profit from this tendency. But it’s possible to overstate Trump’s effects on markets, especially as individual Twitter utterances fade into the white noise.

At any rate, if CEOs are “thinking more systematically” about jobs, that just seems to consist of them telling Trump he can take credit for things that have nothing to do with him. Meanwhile, layoffs in certain firms continue apace, including in industries that Trump has specifically promised to help.

Operation Normal I: Installing experienced national-security and economic teams, obviating the fears of some Republicans that a Trump Cabinet would have a bit of a clown-car aura.
This Cabinet still seems pretty clown-car, to be honest. To the extent that “experienced” people have found their way into the administration, it’s often been the result of Trump’s first choices crashing and burning. Meanwhile, the process of building up a more Beltway-native administration around Trump has resulted in internal divisions becoming inflamed.

What’s more, the real story of Trump’s first 100 days has been all the positions left unfilled (primarily deputy staff at Cabinet agencies) and the massive number of tasks foisted upon Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, whose principal qualification seems to be that he can never be fired.

On a recent episode of “Charlie Rose,” The Atlantic’s David Frum drilled down on both of these points: “The bureaucratic process in the White House depends on deputies’ meetings, where the next level down prepares the issues for the principals. You can’t have deputies meetings if you don’t have deputies, and... a third of the way through the president’s first year, no deputies.”

Frum summed up Kushner like so: “If Jared Kushner were truly a public-spirited individual... he would say to the president that ‘You need an A-team here, and what I’d like to do is run a staffing process whereby instead of giving the China portfolio to me and the Middle East portfolio to me, and the reinventing government portfolio to me, we bring in people who actually knew about these issues before November of last year.’”

”They were too disorganized, too arrogant, and too unprepared to run an Easter Egg roll,” said Frum, “and now they want us to follow them into a military conflict in Northeast Asia.”

Operation Normal II: Post-Flynn, establishing a national-security decision-making process that has produced well-executed policies that have been regarded as sensible by mainstream Republicans. This includes the Syria strike, the embrace of NATO and the China state visit.

The entire “post-Flynn” concept is kind of what I was referring to above, in which Trump’s initial staffing plan ― the one he actually seemed to prefer ― fell apart. (”Flynn,” of course, is Michael Flynn, Trump’s first choice for national security adviser, last seen unsuccessfully lobbying the Senate Intelligence Committee for immunity in exchange for his testimony regarding the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia.) But these are some pretty meager post-Flynn accomplishments, even so. We’re going to continue to support NATO? A Chinese dignitary had a meeting without everyone in the administration vomiting down their shirtfronts? Meanwhile, it’s hard to see what the Syrian strike achieved, other than briefly warming the loins of some cable news presenters.



These last two entries under “hits,” of course, are presented as parts I and II of something called “Operation Normal” ― which seems to imply that Trump has managed to move on from the unsettling extremities of his campaign and settle into a more conventional mode. But as you get into Allen’s enumerated “misses,” you’ll eventually come to this:

Little personal growth in office: His loose style, resistance to structure and amorphous views (and loyalties) leave White House aides insecure, and create internal inefficiencies and blind spots. This chaos contributed to the health-care debacle, provoking weeks of public butt-covering and finger-pointing. To this day, many aides tell us the West Wing reality is even worse than is publicly portrayed.

So Trump has simultaneously gotten more “normal,” but hasn’t achieved any “personal growth?” How does this compute? It seems to me that much of what constitutes Trump’s “hits” ― the occasional conventionality, the retreat from some remote and unpopular positions, the wholesale flip-flops on others ― really should be credited to things like slow-moving institutions, advice from Trump’s second-choice advisers (and Kushner, presumably), and a mobilized resistance that’s pushed back hard on his efforts to enact a travel ban and replace the Affordable Care Act, keeping those items from making the “100 Days” cut.

When you factor in his understaffed administration, the fact that many of the policies he has enacted don’t square with his campaign rhetoric, and the way CEOs have adapted to new realities by cutting Trump in on their public relations strategies, it would seem the story of Trump’s first 100 days is that he’s not so much an influential president as he is a president who can be influenced. Really, the ones who ought to take a victory lap are the people who’ve managed to hem Trump in thus far.

Trump did get Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, though! And he only had to sacrifice the judicial filibuster to do it. He’d better hope the GOP keeps the Senate, or we might be re-evaluating even that accomplishment somewhere down the line.

New Orleans removes first of four Confederate statues

Masked New Orleans workers in bullet-proof vests have removed a Confederate monument that officials said was a symbol of the US South's racist past.

Watched by police snipers, the statue was gone before dawn in a stealthy operation designed to foil protests.

The statues will be relocated to "a place where they can be put in historical context", the city said.
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu said workers had faced "intense" intimidation and threats.
The last chunk of the Battle of Liberty Place obelisk was hauled away in lorries, whose registration plates were covered, by around 05:30 on Monday after four hours.



New Orleans is removing four statues built between 1884-1915
First erected in 1891, it commemorated the Crescent City White League's attempt to overthrow the post-Civil War government.

The monument's original inscription hailed "white supremacy in the South", but this was more recently replaced with another plaque recognising "Americans on both sides" who died during the war.

Mayor Landrieu called it the "most offensive" of the majority African-American city's memorials.
"The removal of these statues sends a clear and unequivocal message to the people of New Orleans and the nation: New Orleans celebrates our diversity, inclusion and tolerance," Mr Landrieu said on Monday.


Lorry number plates were covered to protect the workers identities

Elected officials in the city voted 6-1 to remove four monuments to the Confederacy, the southern states who seceded from the US, sparking the 1861-65 American Civil War.
Activists opposed to the removals have staged vigils, and a car belonging to one worker hired by the city was set on fire.


Supporters of the monuments say they are a cultural legacy that promotes heritage rather than racism.
The decision to remove the statues came in December 2015 after a white supremacist shot dead nine black worshippers at a South Carolina church.

PENANGITES LOSE MILLIONS TO BOGUS SCAM PROMISING RETURNS OF 40% A MONTH

So many get rich schemes in Malaysia exposed when they scam the investors’ money and still there are fools who still go into a hole full of shit when they know there is shit in the hole. Cannot blame anybody but themselves only. Who pays returns of 40% a month on their investments? Even the Ah Longs do not charge that much.

GEORGE TOWN – Many are crying foul after a company offering a high yield investment scheme promising high returns did not live up to its promise.

One of them was Justin Tay who said they were promised returns of up to 40% a month.

  





He said he started investing about a year ago and was confident as the company was properly registered.

He said he has yet to get the returns promised while those in his group of 107 persons have lost some RM6 million, although he believes the number could be higher as the scheme was popular.

“We believed the company was valid and run properly,” he said in a press conference organised by Penang Gerakan today and attended by 20 other investors.

One of them was former factory supervisor Chiang Teik Heng, 57, who said he put his entire Employee Provident Fund (EPF) savings of RM129,000 into the investment in January but has not received anything.

“I invested the whole amount straight away after I was told the scheme was a good saving plan. The agreement also guaranteed the returns but now all my money is gone,” he said.

Geoh Joo Hock, 57, said he has invested RM43,000 in January this year but has not seen a single cent in return.

“My wife and my uncle have invested too, they face a similar fate as me,” he added.







Penang Gerakan vice chairman Oh Tong Keong meanwhile advised the public to be cautious when choosing investments.

He also urged the relevant authorities to speed up the investigations in the matter and called upon Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) and the police to act quickly.

When contacted, Penang Commercial Crime chief ACP Abdul Ghani Ahmad confirmed police reports have been lodged on the issue.

“Investigations are underway,” he said briefly.

Attempts to contact the director of the company was not successful at the time of writing.

– Sundaily 

Traitors in the midst of Pakatan Harapan and mostly in DAP

Traitors in Pakatan Harapan , yes many are and do not realize they will be the ones because they are already been compromised during to the...

Popular Post