y Comment s- MA very interesting article on the dangers of
Huduh for the non-Muslims and also for the Muslims. Once jennie is out of the bottle,
no way can the jennie go back inside the bottle. What is happening to Malaysia
as cannot recognized it anymore , looks more like Pakistan or one of the
Middle-Eastern countries. Poor tourist from the Muslim countries not wanted in
Western Countries folk to Malaysia for a holiday as per western standards but
not in a Western country away from their own countries Huduh law. Party, womanize,
drugs and enjoy all what is ban in their home countries. Soon reality going to
hit them, that the so call playground going to also impose Huduh law, might as
well stay back home and save the vacation money.
The tourist from the Western civilization have
been avoiding Malaysia but the bulk for at least 8 to 10 years and giving their
business to Thailand, Indonesia, Laos and the other South East Asian countries
except for Brunei. The Middle eastern tourist were keeping the hospitality
business afloat and also the shopping complexes’ and once they stop coming we
will end up with no tourist except for the Jihadist who will use this country
as a practice place and with all the empty hotels , shopping complexes’ , a lot
of targets for practice to horn in their skills.
KLIA2 is only are transit stop over for tourist
who do not spend any time or money in Malaysia. The tourists have to fly to
KLIA2 because of Air Asia connectivity and Air Asia hub... That also will be
gone come Huduh implementation.
This Pro-Huduh are not only destroying the
country in the present but also in the future for their kids’ m grandkids’ and
so on. Only occupation they can get is suicide bombers, Rotan specialist, guns
for hire to fight in the Middle East wars a
I can go on and on what Malaysia is going to lose
by implementing Huduh but are they who are devoid of gray matter in their
brains are going to listen, No they will not
See below article about the dangers of Huduh
By
Mujahidin Zulkiffli
The bigger danger of hudud to Non-Muslims.
I've highlighted some potential indirect consequences of hudud to non-Muslims in my previous post. Now this is a bigger one.
It opens a question as to whether the country is a secular or an Islamic country in practice. Why is this dangerous? Because it may pave the way to bigger and crazier things to happen such as how we officially treat non-Muslims.
In a typical Islamic country under Islamic administration, the non-Muslims are divided into a few categories:
1) Kafir harbi fi'lan: These are non-Muslims that are physically hostile (waging war) against Islamic countries.
It's a requirement for Muslims to kill them (as announced by Pahang Mufti recently). Killing kafir harbi fi'lan will not result in any punishment for the Muslim killer.
2) Kafir harbi hukman: These are non-Muslims that do not have any privilege of protection in an Islamic country and they are not waging war against an Islamic country.
Killing kafir harbi hukman doesn't bring death punishment to a Muslim but only half of a diyya (compensation to the family). This was backed by a Hadith, where Abu Juhaifa reported: "The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, judged that a believer should not be killed for killing a disbeliever." Sahih Bukhari 6517 in context of kafir harbi hukman.
3) Kafir muahid and dzimmi: They are non-Muslims who have protection agreement with an Islamic administration. Muahids are not citizens of the Islamic country but have peace agreements. Dzimmis are citizens and pay jizyahs (a form of tax or protection money).
It is haram to kill these types of non-Muslims. Many Hadiths protecting them. Also backed by Quran 9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Oh wait, dzimmis are bound under hudud laws :) jeng jeng jeng!!
PAS are just saying their hudud won't apply to non-Muslims to get the bill passed by the parliament. In history, hudud applies to all. Look at Acheh.
4) Kafir musta'min: Non-Muslim tourists with permission to be in the country. In modern world, Non-Muslims with Visa to be in the country. These Non-Muslims are protected until they become a harbi, even a harbi hukman.. let's say stupid Australians wearing our flags on their arses and being seen as a threat to peace?
In practical, most non-Muslims in Malaysia will be classified as dzimmis (you pay taxes). What if you don't? You become a hukman; can be killed but Muslim killer will have to compensate your family with half a diyya. What if you raise up voices against certain Islamic bodies? Will you be considered as harbi fi'lan? (Pahang Mufti already did) So basically, you're dead.
This is why it's important for Malaysia to remain secular in administration. Letting hudud bill to pass will open bigger Pandora's box.
To my Muslim friends, do we really want this for our non-Muslim friends? Why do we have to create hell on earth in our selfish pursuit of heaven?
#rejectRU355
The bigger danger of hudud to Non-Muslims.
I've highlighted some potential indirect consequences of hudud to non-Muslims in my previous post. Now this is a bigger one.
It opens a question as to whether the country is a secular or an Islamic country in practice. Why is this dangerous? Because it may pave the way to bigger and crazier things to happen such as how we officially treat non-Muslims.
In a typical Islamic country under Islamic administration, the non-Muslims are divided into a few categories:
1) Kafir harbi fi'lan: These are non-Muslims that are physically hostile (waging war) against Islamic countries.
It's a requirement for Muslims to kill them (as announced by Pahang Mufti recently). Killing kafir harbi fi'lan will not result in any punishment for the Muslim killer.
2) Kafir harbi hukman: These are non-Muslims that do not have any privilege of protection in an Islamic country and they are not waging war against an Islamic country.
Killing kafir harbi hukman doesn't bring death punishment to a Muslim but only half of a diyya (compensation to the family). This was backed by a Hadith, where Abu Juhaifa reported: "The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, judged that a believer should not be killed for killing a disbeliever." Sahih Bukhari 6517 in context of kafir harbi hukman.
3) Kafir muahid and dzimmi: They are non-Muslims who have protection agreement with an Islamic administration. Muahids are not citizens of the Islamic country but have peace agreements. Dzimmis are citizens and pay jizyahs (a form of tax or protection money).
It is haram to kill these types of non-Muslims. Many Hadiths protecting them. Also backed by Quran 9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Oh wait, dzimmis are bound under hudud laws :) jeng jeng jeng!!
PAS are just saying their hudud won't apply to non-Muslims to get the bill passed by the parliament. In history, hudud applies to all. Look at Acheh.
4) Kafir musta'min: Non-Muslim tourists with permission to be in the country. In modern world, Non-Muslims with Visa to be in the country. These Non-Muslims are protected until they become a harbi, even a harbi hukman.. let's say stupid Australians wearing our flags on their arses and being seen as a threat to peace?
In practical, most non-Muslims in Malaysia will be classified as dzimmis (you pay taxes). What if you don't? You become a hukman; can be killed but Muslim killer will have to compensate your family with half a diyya. What if you raise up voices against certain Islamic bodies? Will you be considered as harbi fi'lan? (Pahang Mufti already did) So basically, you're dead.
This is why it's important for Malaysia to remain secular in administration. Letting hudud bill to pass will open bigger Pandora's box.
To my Muslim friends, do we really want this for our non-Muslim friends? Why do we have to create hell on earth in our selfish pursuit of heaven?
#rejectRU355
No comments:
Post a Comment