Pages

Thursday, 25 May 2017

Gerakan so worried now wants to Compel coalitions to name PM candidate, EC told

I do not blame Gerakan Youth chief Tan as he is also worried that for sure his boss Najib is going to lose the elections big time and going forward now wants to know who from PH will be PM and at least can be at ease with himself.


Gerakan Youth chief Tan says voters need to know such vital information to make the right choice for Malaysia


KUALA LUMPUR: Gerakan Youth chief Tan Keng Liang today urged the Election Commission to make it compulsory for any political coalition that wishes to contest at least two-thirds of the parliamentary seats to name its prime minister candidate before the next general election.

“Gerakan Youth believe the voters have a right to know who will be a political coalition’s choice as prime minister should they win the next general election.

“This is one of the most important and fundamental information that a voter needs to know before making the right choice for our country.

“As such, we hope that the Election Commission would consider making it compulsory for any political coalitions which wish to contest at least two-thirds of the parliamentary seats to name their designated prime minister before the upcoming general election,” said Tan in a statement.

He said this would protect voters from being misled by any political party and would enable the people to make a more informed decision before casting their votes.

“We urge the Election Commission to take up the task to protect the voters from being hoodwinked by any political coalition. The voters deserve to know such important and fundamental information to make the right choice for Malaysia,” said Tan.

He said such a move would clarify the “massive public confusion” as to who is Pakatan Harapan’s actual prime minister candidate as several names have been mooted.

At the recent PKR Congress, Anwar Ibrahim was announced as Pakatan’s choice for prime minister but Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM) chairman Dr Mahathir Mohamad and president Muhyiddin Yassin, who were present, did not show support for the idea.

Subsequently, several Pakatan leaders including DAP’s Zaid Ibrahim and PPBM Youth chief Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman questioned the move to name Anwar as Pakatan’s prime minister candidate.

“As was correctly pointed out by Amanah’s deputy president Salahuddin Ayub yesterday, this issue could have been easily resolved by holding a Pakatan Harapan presidential council meeting to decide on the matter.

“Question is why Pakatan Harapan refused to announce their designated prime minister?

“At this juncture, there is massive public confusion as to who is actually Pakatan Harapan’s designated prime minister. Several names had been mooted, including Bersatu’s Mahathir, Muhyiddin Yassin, PKR’s Azmin Ali, Wan Azizah and even DAP’s YB Lim Kit Siang,” said Tan.

Poll surveys and pollsters done if the world is flat or you will be PM or are you God


Survey Poll done by the Public for idiocy institute of Mental health if I am indeed God or Satan. The survey was conducted among 1,000 mental patients and ex-patients of the famed Mental Institute of Tanjong Rambutan and Tampoi. The survey sample finding finds that 33% finds me as God 33% finds me as Satan and 34% finds me as the next prime Minister and no country mentions. This is a certified survey poll done and was creditable and does this make it more believable that Najib should be my DPM or the other survey polls says Anwar will be PM and Mahathir will be DPM. Do the 1000 or so speak for all Malaysians

So Surveys done are nothing more than printed toilet paper to wipe your bum


If Plan A fails there is Plan B or C or D and on and on

NAJIB STARTS TO FEEL FEAR: IF PAKATAN WINS GE14, IT IS THE GOVT – IF NAJIB REFUSES TO HAND OVER, HE IS THE ANARCHIST NOT GUAN ENG OR DR MAHATHIR



Apparently on the 10th December 2014, Tokong Lim suggested that if the Barisan Nasional wins the next general elections when it does not get the popular votes, the change must be done from the streets.

He was speaking at the Lecture Theatre, Student Wing, Block S3.1 Level B3, Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.


If the following recording is authentic then the Tokong is not just a corrupted politician and ex-convict, but also an agent provocateur for inciting an undemocratic method to change His Majesty’s government.

LIM GUAN ENG’S SPEECH


“We know that Barisan Nasional are sore losers. They are really sore losers and they will not give up power that easily. Now, what will happen if they refuse to give up power? And I think this is one very important question in people’s minds, especially in the last election when we won the popular mandate but not the number of seats, we can see the huge mess if this issue comes out.

Now, if we win power, both in terms of popular votes, that means the popular votes, but (also) in terms of the number of seats, and then we are not allowed to take power, I think the matter has to be resolved on the streets and it will be resolved on the streets.”


TERJEMAHAN UCAPAN LIM GUAN ENG

“Kita tahu bahawa Barisan Nasional adalah jenis yang tidak berpuas hati jika kalah. Mereka adalah jenis yang sangat tidak berpuas hati jika kalah dan mereka tidak akan menyerahkan kuasa dengan mudah.

Sekarang, apa akan berlaku jika mereka enggan menyerahkan kuasa? Dan saya fikir ini adalah satu soalan yang sangat penting dalam minda rakyat, terutamanya dalam pilihan raya lepas bila kita menang mandat popular tetapi bukan bilangan kerusi, kita boleh lihat kacau-bilau besar jika isu ini timbul.

Sekarang, jika kita mendapat kuasa, di dalam kedua-dua dari segi undi popular, maknanya tentunya undi popular, tetapi (juga) dari segi bilangan kerusi, dan kemudian kita tidak dibenarkan untuk mengambil-alih kuasa, saya fikir perkara ini mesti diselesaikan di jalan-jalan raya dan ia akan diselesaikan di jalan-jalan raya.”

This is what the law says:


PENAL CODE




130G. Whoever knowingly— (a) incites or promotes the commission of a terrorist act; shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to thirty years, and shall also be liable to fine.

153. Whoever malignantly or wantonly, by doing anything which is illegal, gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause the offence of rioting to be committed, shall, if the offence of rioting is committed in consequence of such provocation, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both; and if the offence of rioting is not committed, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine or with both.


DEFINITION OF TERRORIST ACT


(3) An act or threat of action falls within this subsection if it— (a) involves serious bodily injury to a person; 90 Laws of Malaysia ACT 574 (b) endangers a person’s life; (c) causes a person’s death; (d) creates a serious risk to the health or the safety of the public or a section of the public; (e) involves serious damage to property; (f) involves the use of firearms, explosives or other lethal devices; (g) involves releasing into the environment or any part of the environment or distributing or exposing the public or a section of the public to— (i) any dangerous, hazardous, radioactive or harmful substance; (ii) any toxic chemical; or (iii) any microbial or other biological agent or toxin; (h) is designed or intended to disrupt or seriously interfere with, any computer systems or the provision of any services directly related to communications infrastructure, banking or financial services, utilities, transportation or other essential infrastructure; (i) is designed or intended to disrupt, or seriously interfere with, the provision of essential emergency services such as police, civil defence or medical services; (j) involves prejudice to national security or public safety; (k) involves any combination of any of the acts specified in paragraphs (a) to (j), and includes any act or omission constituting an offence under the Aviation Offences Act 1984 [Act 307].

The police must act on this lunatic.


– https://seademon.me/

Japanese Fashion Craze: Fake See-Through Skirts!

Japanese Fashion Craze: Fake See-Through Skirts!

by David Emery

Is there a fashion craze in Japan dating back to February 2003 in which women's skirts are designed to look like they're transparent — though they really aren't?

ARE JAPANESE SEE-THROUGH SKIRTS REAL?


This rumor appears to be false as there isn't a single legitimate press report to back up the claim and substantiate these images which have been Photoshopped.

In every one of the photos, the contours of the "imitation" legs and panties match the poses of the models exactly — which shouldn't be the case if they're printed on the surfaces of the skirts.


What we see instead are passable representations of what it might look like if the clothing were transparent.

Secondly, whoever manipulated these images made subtle errors, most notably in Photo #5; when the image is enlarged, lines and shadows belonging to the superimposed legs and panties cut visibly across the model's purse straps (see detail at right). All the examples, when examined closely, give the impression that the panty images were overlaid directly onto the photographs, not imprinted on the clothing.

Japanese fashion designers do have a reputation for cutting-edge ideas, but ersatz see-through clothing isn't one of them. At least not yet.


As the Toronto Star reported:



Can't Wait Till These Hit The Stores 

"They (the pictures) are quite common in Japan. There are a lot of cheap porno magazines that use them," Kjeld Duits, 43, says in an interview from Ashia, near Osaka, Japan, where he works as a journalist and runs a street fashion/trend Web site called japanesestreets.com.

"The only time you see these scenes are in photographs in porno magazines. There's nothing like this in the street," Duits says.

The magazines use a computer graphics program to combine the image of a skirted woman with another wearing just underwear. The end result looks as if the skirt is see-through.

According to Duits, the magazines will usually claim to have taken the pictures using a special camera lens that allows them to shoot through clothes.


JAPANESE BREAST SCARVES


In addition to the see-through skirts, Japan has also been a hotbed for some other unusual fashion items that have been looked on with fascination including the eye popping "breast scarves" which were widely covered by Western news media. The scarves were actually part of an art exhibition and weren't widely sold to consumers.


FASHION HOAX UPDATES


Fashion Hoax Fools People Worldwide
From Japanese Streets, an ezine devoted to street fashions in Japan: "Thousands of people worldwide are being fooled by a clever fashion hoax which plays on people's secret desires...." (22 Feb. 2003)


Queensland Tabloid Bites on Hoax

Does the article headlined "A Cheeky Skirt?" which ran in the Feb. 16, 2003 edition of The Sunday Mirror authenticate this tall tale — the answer is no, it does not. Evidently the Mirror copped the story (and one of the photos) from the viral email, which had already been circulating for several days at that point (Feb. 16, 2003).

Money Money and spend like nobody's business

SHOCK EXPOSE: NAJIB SPLURGED OVER HALF A BILLION OF STOLEN 1MDB MONEY TO BUY THE ‘LOYALTY’ OF UMNO DIVISION CHIEFS – & KEPT THE REMAINING BILLIONS FOR ‘SHOPPING’ FOR HIMSELF & ROSMAH?
Politics | May 25, 2017 by | 0 Comments

Sarawak Report now has comprehensive figures, showing exactly how Prime Minister Najib Razak distributed the money he stole from the 1MDB Development Fund during the period of the last 2013 election.

Apart from tens of millions spent on luxury goods, jewellery shops, motor-car retailers and the odd handout to family members, associates and consultants, the majority of the spending went on UMNO and its political allies.


The handouts total over RM600 million, which Najib himself dished over in a series of more than 130 cheques signed out of the accounts into which he had been ploughing 1MDB money since 2011. 

Nazri Admits He Got RM1 Million From Najib, Says Muhyiddin And Shafie Apdal Received Much More

 The majority of these cheques went to divisions of UMNO in the days immediately running up to the election and it is believed that the Prime Minister was attempting to buy personal loyalty through handing out the money himself.


One of Najib's smaller cheques was to Sarawak's SUPP for RM500,000


One of Najib’s smaller cheques was to Sarawak’s SUPP for RM500,000 – date April 5th 2013
Cheque of April 5th was transacted thee days later on 8th


Cheque of April 5th was transacted thee days later on 8th
Election Bonanza

Nazri: RM600 million price tag for BN in last general election

Our data, obtained from the task force investigations, shows the transaction dates on those cheques, the amount and the recipients. It also shows the accounts from which the money came and all have been established as being in the name of Najib himself, funded by money traced to 1MDB.  In particular, AmBank account number 211 202 2009694 was the account that received US$681 million from Tanore Finance Corporation in March 2013 – money identified as having come from 1MDB by the US Dept of Justice:

1MDB financed account from which the handouts were made


1MDB financed account from which the handouts were made
The pre-election cash bonanzas included a RM100,000,000 cheque handed to ‘Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Malaya Bersatu (UMNO)’ 11th April 2013 a week after the election had been announced.  On 22nd April UMNO Malaysia again received two further cheques of RM50 million each.

Individual cheques were also handed out to all UMNO and related BN divisions, for example Badan Perhubungan UMNO Negeri Pahang received RM15 million on 18th April and the following day, April 19th, UMNO Penang received RM5 million. Kelantan division received RM5 million on 10th April.

Amongst the many other similar payments was RM5 million both the UMNO state party of Kedah and the MCA Selangor Liason Committee on 8th April and RM20 million to UMNO Selangor on April 24th.  UMNO Perak received its handout on April 29th of RM25 million with another five million each going to UMNO Selangor and the MCA Selangor Liason Committee again the following day.  Also on 30th April Johor UMNO received RM25 million, less than a week before the election.

Familliar signature for all these cheques

Familliar signature for all these cheques
The UMNO womens’ divisions also received significant pay outs, signifying the party’s appreciation of the importance of ‘winning’ the female vote: Pergerakan Puteri UMNO Malaysia received a RM5 million cheque 27th February and Pergerakan Wanita UMNO Selangor RM1.1 million 22nd March and Wanita Barisan Nasional Selangor RM1 million on 17th May.

Allied parties also received big money, for example the Liberal Democratic Party received RM1 million 5th April, the Malaysian Indian Congress received RM10 million on the 18th April and a further RM5 million 26th April. SUPP received RM2 million 20th March.  The previous year UPCO had received RM2 million, indeed over the election huge sums were dished out to Sabah and particularly Sarawak (of which more later).


Saudi story


Since all this money came from stolen public funds, borrowed at punishing rates of interest under false pretenses, the ultimate cost to the Malaysian taxpayer will be at least double the sums handed out in this exercise to buy votes for the ruling party, who was abusing its position in such a spectacular fashion.

Furthermore, as Najib was operating a secret slush fund, which his Deputy Muhyiddin and others who were senior in the party at the time say they were entirely unaware of, there appears to be no official record relating to who received and handled the money and what it was actually spent on. Clearly, these staggering sums were distributed over and above UMNO’s official party funds for the election.

Najib has attempted to legitimise this money by claiming that it was all donated to him personally by an anonymous Saudi royal, in order to make sure he could ‘win’ the election in order to promote ‘moderate Islam’.  ‘Moderate Islam’ is not generally regarded as the Saudi trademark, yet an even more absurd excuse was then spun in the western media (BBC and Telegraph) claiming that the money was focused on ‘projects’ in Sarawak ‘to prevent the uptake of Islamic extremism’ in the majority Christian state.

The fact that such levels of expenditures and foreign interference is plainly illegal appears a lesser evil to the Prime Minister, rather than admitting that the money was stolen from 1MDB.  However, money trails released by the US Dept of Justice demonstrate that this was where the money came from.


How could they spend the money?


The major part of these sums was handed out in the form of cheques during the closing days of the election campaign.  Between April 8th and the election 5th May around RM400 million was signed out. The question therefore has to be asked what was the money actually for?

There are limited ways in which local political parties might be able to spend such vast quantities of last minute cash.  It appears the party received this last minute injection therefore just in the final closing hours of the campaign.

Advertising is not really an issue for BN, since they control the entire state and private mainstream media, which acts as an obedient propaganda tool for the party in return for their privileges and licences.  Given the lack of records it would also appear impossible to prove how much of the money reached its intended purpose, as opposed to buying the loyalty of the trusted intermediaries who handled it. So, what was this money for?

One obvious allegation that begs investigation is vote buying.





Sequence showing money being handed out to voters by BN stall outside polling station in Perak


Sequence showing money being handed out to voters by BN stall outside polling station in Perak
Anecdotes abound, backed by solid photographic evidence in some cases, of cash being handed out to voters outside polling booths by UMNO workers, who were clearly distinguishable by their flags and logos.  Despite numerous complaints the courts have refused to entertain a single case and the Election Commission also has refused to acknowledge or tackle Malaysia’s problem with blatant ‘money politics’.

People are entitled to assume that a man who is willing to raid his country’s development fund, as well as the civil servant pension fund, the prilgims’ fund, the farmers’ fund and doubtless other sources of public money, is unlikely to hesitate to attempt to bribe voters with a little of that money back in the form of payment for votes.

If the Prime Minister has another explanation for these last minute cheques, Sarawak Report would be happy to publish it.  His PR man Paul Stadlen has our email.

– http://www.sarawakreport.org

EMPTY BEDS AT EMPTY HOTEL

Business at Trump's hotel in the trendy neighborhood of SoHo is suffering — and layoffs are looming anymore?


RACHEL LEAH


TOPICS: DONALD TRUMP, KOI, MAR-A-LAGO, TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL WASHINGTON D.C., TRUMP SOHO, POLITICS NEWS, ELECTIONS NEWS, BUSINESS NEWS, NEWS


Does anyone want to stay at Trump's Manhattan hotel anymore?


Trump SoHo is in trouble. Five months into President Donald Trump’s polarizing presidency, the lower Manhattan hotel is experiencing a decline in corporate events, and hotel layoffs are coming. At least in New York City, the Trump marquee is turning people away.

At its peak, one could spend $700 a night to stay at the five-star hotel, but now rooms have dropped to nearly half that—well below surrounding five-star hotels in the area, and even bordering the four-star hotel price range. Koi, the restaurant that was located on the ground floor of Trump SoHo has closed, citing a decline in business, and the election of Trump as the turning point.


“Before Trump won we were doing great. There were a lot of people we had, our regulars, who’d go to the hotel but are not affiliated with Trump,” former Koi busser and host Jonathan Grullon told GrubStreet. “And they were saying if he wins, we are not coming here anymore.” The lobby space where the restaurant had previously occupied is now locked and empty.

Business throughout the hotel is also suffering. Out of a staff of 80, 12 room attendants are to be laid off, turn-down service will be slashed, and a mere 11 corporate events were booked in the hotel since January, according to WNYC.

“I have to believe that a lot of organizations would not want to have meetings at a Trump Hotel just to not have to deal with it,” Jan de Roos, professor at the Cornell Hotel School, told WNYC. And this includes potential hotel guests. Players of the Cleveland Cavaliers made news back in December, when Lebron James and others refused to stay in the Trump hotel that was booked for them on a trip to New York.

This isn’t the first time Trump’s hotels have been in jeopardy, nonetheless, The Trump International Hotel in Washington is thriving, and CNBC reported that Mar-A-Lago membership fees have doubled. For the locations where Trump is known to frequent, access is priceless.

Jason Chaffetz May Be Leaving Office As Early As Tomorrow (UPDATE)


Congress and the GOP are losing a powerful voice and the entire DC area is utterly confused. Who are we talking about? Pitbull chairman of the House oversight committee, Jason Chaffetz (aka @jasoninthehouse) is apparently not going to in the House for much longer.

Yesterday news broke that he would not be seeking re-election in 2018. Reminder that Chaffetz and Nunes were tasked with investigating Trump/Russia. Nunes stepped aside after his crazy, straight out of a Mr. Bean movie, midnight rendezvous on the White House grounds shenanigans where he was trying to cook up *proof* of Obama wiretapping came to light. Now Trump is losing his other best friend. But WHY??

While we were all sitting around playing armchair detective, even more craziness came to light today:

Now, reports are surfacing that Chaffetz may be leaving his role before his term is even up:
BREAKING NEWS: @jasoninthehouse tells KSL's @DougWrightShow he might not finish his Congressional term.
The Hill reports that Chaffetz told KSL Radio: "I will continue to weigh the options, but I might depart early" on Thursday.

And literally as I was typing this post, these tweets starting blowing up my feed:
Word on the ground from Utah:

Chaffetz will be doing announcement tomorrow that he is stepping down from Congress
Analysis | Jason Chaffetz and Devin Nunes both faced investigating Trump. Now both are stepping...
The most thankless job in Washington?


No one knows what the heck is going on. Chaffetz used the tried and true "desire to spend more time with his family in Utah and return to the private sector" excuse that is most often cited.

The most odd part - there are 19 months left before the midterms. To run out the door so soon speaks to something possibly more sinister. Is he compromised in some way? Do the Russians have kompromat on him? No one knows for sure...but the timing sure is suspicious.


Will his new handle be @JasonInTheBigHouse one day?

It appears that Chaffetz is using his remaining time in office to leverage a juicy TV gig or some wingnut welfare, according to Politico.

“I started poking around to see what I might be worth and what sort of possibilities are there,” Chaffetz said in a phone interview with POLITICO Thursday afternoon. “And I got a series of ‘Let us know when you’re serious.’ Well now I can say, ‘Can you tell I am serious?’… I’ll take a little bit of time to sort out. I’d be thrilled to have a television relationship. But there’s a number of things I’d like to do.”

...

“I might depart early,” he said in the interview. “It’s not tomorrow, it’s not next week. If it is, it’s going to be in the months to come.”

Asked if he is resigning because of a yet-to-be revealed scandal, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely, positively not.

“Not in any way shape or form,” he said. “I’ve been given more enemas by more people over the last eight years than you can possibly imagine. From the Secret Service to the Democratic Party. I am who I am. If they had something really scandalous, it would’

AND

Utahns Puzzled by Rep. Chaffetz Decision to Quit Congress


by CORKY SIEMASZKO


Not everybody in Utah is thrilled that Rep. Jason Chaffetz is coming home so soon.


The powerful chairman of the House Oversight Committee, who surprised his constituents last week by throwing in the towel after more than eight years in Congress, has become the subject of speculation — and is even taking some flak back in Utah — for his sudden decision.

Even some Chaffetz supporters in a reliably red state that has regularly reelected him by huge margins are having trouble wrapping their heads around the timing of this move.

"For nearly a decade Chaffetz has been a mainstay of Utah political life," the conservative Deseret News wrote in an editorial last month thanking him for his service. "Yet, he also has been a lightning rod."

"Clearly, Chaffetz is unafraid of criticism, which has added fuel to the speculations as to why he made this announcement nearly two years before his term ends," the paper stated.


 Rep. Jason Chaffetz speaks during a town hall meeting at Brighton High School, Thursday, Feb. 9, 2017, in Cottonwood Heights, Utah.


In a decidedly harsher editorial, the Salt Lake Tribune asked "why now?" and then came up with some possible reasons: Chaffetz is "intimidated" by the prospect of running against a well-funded Democratic rival in 2018; he was rattled at the raucous Town Hall meetings where he was heckled by constituents yelling "Do your job!"; he was taking too much heat from both Democrats and Republicans for refusing to investigate the Trump Administration and potential Russian involvement in the presidential election.

"He promised to be a 'kid in a candy store' while investigating a Trump presidency," the paper stated. "We haven't seen anything close to that."

That was followed-up by a column in the Salt Lake Tribune by the Democrat that Chaffetz trounced in his last election who accused the congressman of "hypocrisy and moral cowardice."

"Rep. Jason Chaffetz's recent announcement that he intends to leave office early is equivalent to a soldier abandoning his post because he finds his duty too hard," declared Stephen Tryon, a retired Army officer. "This decision demonstrates the truth of what I told Chaffetz to his face during our debate last October. He is a man who puts his personal interests first, his political fortunes second, and his duty to our country a distant third."

The broadside from Tryon, who Chaffetz bested in 2016 with a solid 74 percent of the vote, came a week after the high-profile congressman announced he would not seek reelection in 2018.

That was followed with another surprise announcement — that Chaffetz was flying back to Utah for surgery on a foot that he injured a dozen years ago and had been held together at one point by 14 screws and a metal plate.


Billboard in Utah County on I-15 between Center Street and University Parkway on April 11, 2017 in Provo, Utah. File Steve Griffin / AP


He has since returned to Washington, the stated reason being his intention to cast his vote in favor of the GOP's latest version of an Obamacare repeal.

Asked for a response, a Chaffetz spokeswoman said they have no comment.

But Chris Karpowitz, a political science professor at Utah's Brigham Young University, said there is genuine consternation in Utah about Chaffetz, who nevertheless remains a popular political figure in the state.

"I think people are more puzzled than anything else, puzzled about the timing of Chaffetz's decision," said Karpowitz. "It's been an open secret that he eventually wanted to come back to Utah and run for statewide office. But he has said for years he basically wanted to serve out this term, so it's hard to know what to make of it."

Chaffetz is a Mormon and a Republican in a state where 75 percent of the voters are Mormon and vote Republican. And he's never faced a serious challenger in any of his elections.

Now, however, there are "plenty of warning signs" that Chaffetz might have trouble with a well-funded Democrat like Kathryn Allen, who is vying for his seat, said Karpowitz.

Dr. Kathryn Allen
Utah democratic U.S. House candidate Dr. Kathryn Allen speaks during an interview at a clinic on March 14, 2017 in Salt Lake City. File Rick Bowmer / AP

While many Republicans cheered Chaffetz on when his congressional committee went after Hillary Clinton, some of those same Republicans are troubled by the "double standard" he appears to be applying to Trump.

"He promised years of investigation in Clinton," Karpowitz said. But "he has not figured out how to be chair of the oversight committee under a Republican administration."

Jason Perry of the non-partisan Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah said Chaffetz "represents one of the safest Republican districts in the country."

"And he came home to a town hall with people booing," he said. "That's the mood of the country right now."

No doubt some of Chaffetz's constituents were taken aback by the timing of his announcement, but others "are taking him at his word that he's doing this for his family and already thinking about who his successor will be," said Perry.

Chaffetz, 50, did not give a specific reason for why he was quitting Congress early beyond wanting to spend more time at home with his family — and less time sleeping on a cot in his Washington office. But last year he telegraphed his eventual exit in an interview with The Deseret News in which he also said he might run for Utah governor in 2020.

"I'm not going to be here forever," he told the paper. "I would take a serious, serious look at running for governor."

Lauren Littlefield, the head of the Utah Democratic Party, said the first thing she thought when Chaffetz made his announcement was, "Oh, he's really going to run for governor in 2020."

"Nobody here expects Jason Chaffetz to be done with his political career," she said. "But when we heard he was going to resign early, then of course all the rumors started to swirl around. There were some outlandish ones about him and there was talk about how he was leaving Washington because the Russians knew about them all."

Littlefield said neither she nor most Utah Democrats put much stock in the rumors.

"We respect the guy," she said. "But we certainly disagree with him on everything."

Utah state Sen. Deidre Henderson, who got her start in politics working on a Chaffetz campaign, said "anyone who knows Jason knows that those theories are ridiculous."

"Despite what you may read elsewhere, if Jason were to run again next year, he would win decisively," she wrote in an email to NBC News. "A recent Utah Policy poll shows his approval rating as high now as it was before his announcement."

Raised Jewish, Chaffetz father's first wife was Kitty Dukakis — who later married failed Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis — and his grandfather was an FBI agent.

Chaffetz became a Mormon while a student at Brigham Young University. Before he got into politics, he was a spokesman for the Utah-based Nu Skin Enterprises, a personal care and dietary supplement company that had been accused in the past of being a pyramid scheme — and which now operates abroad in countries like Russia and China.

While Chaffetz no longer works for Nu Skin, records show the firm was his biggest campaign contributor.

Longtime observers of the Utah political scene said it would not surprise then if Chaffetz returned to Nu Skin.

"From there he could make a run for governor," said one, who asked not to be identified. "He does have ambitions to run for governor."

Nu Skin spokesman Scott Bisang said that while Chaffetz remains good friends with the founders of the company they have heard nothing about him being back on the payroll

AND
14 reasons why Jason Chaffetz must leave Congress immediately


After 16 years in Congress, including two as chairman of the powerful House Oversight Committee, it's time for Rep. Jason Chaffetz to leave Capitol Hill. An accident that occurred during the W. Bush administration makes his departure not only necessary but urgent.

As the Utah Republican packs his bags, he can only blame himself for his own clumsiness. "Almost 12 years ago," Chaffetz explained in a statement Wednesday night, "I shattered several bones in my foot which required 14 screws and a metal plate to repair."


In the most dad-explanation ever, Chaffetz said he wishes the injury was the result of something cool like "cliff diving in Mexico." In reality, the blundering Republican fell off a ladder in his garage. Now University of Utah doctors "recommend immediate surgery to remove all the hardware or I could be at risk for serious infection."

Chaffetz will be off his feet and out of Congress for several weeks during recovery, missing work until at least mid-May.

After the announcement, an army of trolls became sudden experts in podiatry. In addition to the expected quips about pre-existing conditions, several questioned why Chaffetz needed the surgery all these years later. While that decision should be made between a man and his doctor, this type of operation doesn't seem that uncommon.

The more interesting question is what Chaffetz stands to gain by leaving Washington for a while. By design or by accident, the foot surgery could give him a leg up in the long run. Specifically, he might miss critical and controversial votes.

While Utah never set up an exchange, the red state has experienced a surge in Obamacare signups. Last year enrollment grew by more than 12 percent, the New York Times reported in March, an increase of about 197,187 Utahns. While in recovery, Chaffetz wouldn't have to vote on repealing Obamacare and wouldn't risk alienating those voters.

The foot injury could let Chaffetz sidestep a controversy that could hurt him if he decided to run for governor in 2020. Either way, hopefully, the surgery goes off without a hitch.

AND THEN 


Why is Jason Chaffetz leaving Congress? There are a bunch of conspiracies swirling around


The Utah Republican spread all sorts of crazy ideas about Barack Obama. Now others are doing it to him

MATTHEW SHEFFIELD

Utah congressman Jason Chaffetz is no stranger to conspiracy theories. But now that he’s announced that he’s not going to run for re-election, he has become the subject of conspiracy theories rather than the one spreading them.

Of course, there are more rational explanations for why the ultra-ambitious Republican would abandon a high-profile office and walk away from the television cameras he so loves. Being the chairman of the House Oversight Committee of the same party as President Donald Trump is surely an uncomfortable position. And it’s probably not what Chaffetz was expecting, as the Utah-based Deseret News reported earlier on Friday:

This became most apparent when he parlayed his rising visibility into a chairmanship of the House Oversight Committee, which he used to go after Planned Parenthood, Hillary Clinton and other favorite punching bags of the right. He became the most high-profile antagonist of the Obama administration, the tormentor-in-chief, and in the final weeks of the campaign he vowed that he would continue to investigate Hillary Clinton for using an unclassified email server, improperly staffing the embassy in Benghazi, and any other possible crimes, whether she won re-election or not.

Then Donald Trump got elected and everything changed.

“Trump getting elected was the worst possible thing for him,” says one Utah political insider. “Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, he would have had a nightly gig on Fox News. It would have been Crooked Hillary every night. Instead he got Trump.”

Had Clinton won, Chaffetz would have used the platform to attack the administration at every turn, the subpoena power literally resting in the pen in his pocket. But now, he was suddenly limited by demands to play team ball for a team that was already struggling, fumbling healthcare right out of the gate. And whatever Trump and the fractious House Republicans did, he would be held accountable, even though he would have little control.


Being in charge of investigating allegations of government impropriety against the famously vindictive Trump is bad enough. Add to that fact that 97 percent of Republicans in a recent survey still support him and that alone could account for Chaffetz’s desire to get out.

The self-aggrandizing congressman might also have gotten tired of the humble image he’s created for himself by refusing to rent or purchase a house in the D.C. area. Instead, he sleeps in his office.

“I’m turning 50 and I’m sleeping on a cot,” he told the Deseret News. “Maybe it’s time to reevaluate my life.”

Other legit theories are that Chaffetz is getting ready to run for Utah governor in 2020 or Utah senator in 2018, although he has denied such claims. He has, however, registered web domains in the event that he chooses to do so.

But the abruptness of Chaffetz’s withdrawal has also generated some alternative and unbelievable explanations. Louise Mensch, a former Conservative British member of Parliament who has somehow transformed herself into a hero for anti-Trump conspiracy theorists, has been testing out various allegations against Chaffetz on Twitter.

He’s certainly been on her mind for quite some time.


“I think Chaffetz may be gay and in the closet. Would hurt with his base,” Mensch wrote on Twitter Feb. 1. “Nothing at all wrong with being gay. but exposure might hurt Chaffetz politically,” she added.

“I’m totally serious. Chaffetz acts like a man being blackmailed,” she wrote a few days later.

Mensch also appeared to believe that the FBI is investigating Chaffetz for using an illegal private mail server like former secretary of state Hillary Clinton did.

On Thursday she cited someone else claiming that Chaffetz was being blackmailed by the Russian government for allegedly having an affair. That couldn’t be true, Mensch said, because the Russians allegedly have evidence for Chaffetz’s being involved in a money-laundering scheme.

No one has presented any evidence for these claims and it’s unlikely that someone will. But it is certainly a karmic reversal to see Chaffetz, one of the foremost propagators of the Benghazi conspiracy theory, getting a taste of his own medicine.

 Matthew Sheffield

A writer, web developer, and former tv producer, Matthew Sheffield covers politics, media, and technology for Salon. You can email him via m.sheffield@salon.com or follow him on Twitter


Traitors in the midst of Pakatan Harapan and mostly in DAP

Traitors in Pakatan Harapan , yes many are and do not realize they will be the ones because they are already been compromised during to the...

Popular Post