Transocean Battens Down The Hatches
Summary
RIG sold $1.4B in rig assets to Borr.
It protects liquidity and unloads
newbuilds that it might not need.
With oil sub-$50, capex might not
return to offshore for a while.
It's smart to batten down the hatches.
Transocean
(NYSE:RIG) is selling its shallow-water drilling
rigs for $1.35 billion to Borr Drilling:
Borr Drilling, founded by former executives of financially
troubled Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL), has snapped up
Transocean's fleet of shallow-water drilling rigs for $1.35 billion.
Since then Troeim has re-established himself as an independent
player in the global shipping market with a high profile and a reputation for
successful capital raising.
The rig market deal is
Borr's biggest since it was set up last year by Tor Olav Troeim and other
executives who had left Seadrill, once the jewel in the crown of Norwegian-born
shipping tycoon John Fredriksen but now battling with $14 billion in debt and liabilities.
The deal includes 10 high-specification jack-ups and five
newbuilds. Transocean will retain 50 rigs used for exploration in deeper
waters.
Transocean Is Battening
The Hatches
The decline in oil prices from their Q2 2014 peak have ravaged
energy-related names. It has hit the offshore drilling market particularly hard
given the segment has the highest break-even costs. Unbridled expansion by
certain offshore contractors helped contribute to their own demise. That said,
the offshore market remains oversupplied and day rates continue to fall.
Transocean's average day rates fell 1% sequentially.
The biggest decline was in Mid-Water Floaters which saw day rates
fall 47%; Ultra-deepwater Floaters were next with an 18% decline. Moreover,
fleet utilization was only 46% during the quarter, down from 49% in Q3 and 60%
in the year earlier period. Falling day rates and subpar utilization do not
bode well.
The land-drilling sector of the oil industry staged a rebound in
Q4 2016; however, the market for offshore drilling remains in the doldrums, and
the offshore contracting market remains oversupplied. Transocean's rig
utilization remains under 50%, and its Q4 revenue fell sequentially by 10%.
High-specification jack-ups experienced flat revenue growth during the quarter
and currently represents about 8% of total revenue.
Revenue growth will likely be subpar for a while. According
to management, prices might have to stay above $60 for capex to
return to the offshore sector:
While we and the rest of
the off-shore drilling industry have done an admirable job of reducing cost
through the downturn, the IOCs are unlikely to sanction new projects until we
see a sustainable price per barrel in excess of $60.
That could be problematic as oil prices have now fallen below $50.
The OPEC supply cut helped, but the pick up in shale drilling increased supply
and hurt prices.
The Transaction Helps
Protect Liquidity
If $60 per barrel is a key metric and that metric will not be
reached any time soon, the goal for offshore contractors should be to survive.
This transaction should help Transocean to do that. At year-end 2016 the
company had cash of $2.5 billion and debt of $8.3 billion. Its debt/EBITDA of
3.9x is nothing to write home about, but it is better than Seadrill's 7.1x.
The company would forgo revenue from High-Specification jack-ups
of $66 million per quarter. However, it would bring in nearly $1.4 billion, allowing
it to monetize certain of its rig assets. Transocean could use this cash inflow
to offset the nearly $1.1 billion it obligated to pay for five newbuilds. I
believe this is a savvy move by management to protect its balance sheet and
unload newbuilds to Borr that it does not need.
The move also signals that growth in offshore drilling could be
dead for a long time. Investors should take heed.
Conclusion
This is a savvy move by Transocean. With oil sub-$50 I expect its
revenue and EBITDA to remain challenged. With RIG trading at 5.3x trailing
EBITDA I rate the stock a hold.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions
in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next
72 hours.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I
am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any
company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment