The US Is About to Stop Buying Tomahawk Missiles, Like the Ones That Hit Syria
But
it’s planning to upgrade its existing stock — and lay the groundwork for a
next-generation cruise missile.
The venerable Tomahawk cruise missile, used in conflicts big and small since 1991,
took center stage once again in an April 7 strike that rained some five
dozen of the weapons upon a Syrian airfield
believed to have launched a chemical attack. But its end is in sight, if not
exactly imminent.
The U.S. Navy, which currently has
some 4,000 Tomahawks, plans to stop buying the venerable weapon in the next few
years. Service leaders haven’t fully articulated their plans to replace it, but
they have started talking about the need for a “Next Generation Land Attack
Weapon” slated to enter service more than a
decade hence.
In 2014, then-Navy acquisition chief Sean
Stackley (now the Navy’s acting secretary) told the House Armed Services
Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee that the next-generation weapon
could be an upgraded Tomahawk or a different weapon.
“[W]e are moving forward with development of
what has been referred to as next-generation land-attack weapon,” Stackley
said. “And the key elements of that weapon will be its increased lethality,
survivability beyond what Tomahawk brings today.”
More recently, in October, the Navy asked
defense firms to provide information about technologies they are working on that
could be used in these future weapons.
The Navy said it would use the information “to
analyze individual and combinations (Family of Systems (FOS)) of existing
weapons, modifications to existing weapons, ongoing demonstration efforts, new
weapon designs, and enabling capabilities to determine the most cost effective
manner in which to achieve an optimal level of operational capability with an
acceptable level of operational risk.”
In the meantime, the Navy plans to upgrade
much of its existing stockpile, enabling it, for example, to sink ships. That
kind of capability expansion in line with an overall Pentagon drive to make
existing weapons more flexible. Last year, Navy officials announced they had quietly modified the SM-6, an
interceptor built to shoot down aircraft and missiles, to sink ships.
Both
the Tomahawk and SM-6 are built by Massachusetts-based Raytheon, whose shares rose in
trading on Friday.
Last year, the Navy asked Congress
for $187 million to buy 100 new Tomahawks. Last month, the
Trump administration asked lawmakers for
$85 million to buy an additional 96 missiles. Budget documents show the Navy
has purchased more than 8,000 Tomahawks overall.
Todd Harrison, a defense budget expert with
the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said it
would cost the Pentagon about $89 million to replace the 59 Tomahawks that
stuck Syria early Friday morning local time.
·
Marcus Weisgerber is
the global business editor for Defense One, where he writes about the
intersection of business and national security. He has been covering defense
and national security issues for more than a decade, previously as Pentagon
correspondent for Defense News and chief editor of
No comments:
Post a Comment